ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Compliance and Risk

May I Send Adverse Action Notices to Joint Applicants at the Same Mailing Address—Even if They Reside at Different Addresses?

March 11, 2021
Reading Time: 3 mins read

By Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM

Q:The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires that adverse action notices include any credit score used in taking adverse action on a credit application. My understanding is that for joint applications, the credit score notices must be in separate envelopes. May the credit score notices be sent in separate envelopes to the same mailing address even if the joint applicants reside at different addresses? To illustrate, if applicant A is the primary applicant and lives at address A, and applicant B lives at address B, may the bank provide the credit score notices in separate envelopes to address A, or must the bank send the notice to each applicant at his or her own address?

A: The bank should send the notice to each applicant at his or her address.

For technical reasons related to limitations on rulemaking authority, neither Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity Act) nor Regulation V (FCRA) addresses this directly. However, Section 1022.75 of Regulation V offers direction. It addresses “risk-based pricing” notice requirements, which include an option of providing credit scores. Section 1022.75(c) requires sending “a separate notice” if a notice includes a credit score, “whether the consumers have the same address or not.” This suggests that the bank should send separate notices to each consumer at his or her address unless the applicants have otherwise instructed. If the applicants live at the same address, the bank may insert notices into separate envelopes addressed to each applicant and then send them in an envelope mailed to their joint address.

If a credit score is not used and the consumers have the same address, the bank may send a joint notice. The reason for the distinction is that, for whatever reason, credit scores are considered more personal and confidential than the reasons for a loan rejection. (Answer provided December 2020.)

Q:A bank customer who is currently on active duty with the Army opened a real estate investment loan with my bank before he went on active duty, so the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act covers this loan. The customer has requested that the bank lower the interest rate and payments on this loan pursuant to SCRA. One of the bank’s requirements for this type of loan is that the borrower reside within our designated trade area, but the request alerted us to the fact that the service member no longer lives in the area. Would there be any compliance issues if the bank were to require the customer to refinance the loan elsewhere as he is now located outside of the bank’s trade area?

A:Yes, this would likely violate SCRA because the bank is calling the loan before maturity. Section 3937 of the SCRA prohibits the acceleration of principal repayment, which is essentially what the bank would be doing by requiring the service member to refinance the loan. In addition, if the service member refinances while on active duty, he will lose his SCRA interest rate, repayment and foreclosure protections.

In addition, servicemembers are protected from any penalty imposed due solely to their invocation of their SCRA rights. Section 3919 of the SCRA provides that “no stay, postponement, or suspension of any . . . civil obligation or liability applied for, or received by, a person in military service can be the sole basis for . . . a decision by a creditor to deny or to revoke credit; to change the terms of an existing credit arrangement.”

If his request for the interest rate reduction triggered the bank’s request to refinance, it appears that the bank is revoking or changing the terms of the credit. (Answer provided December 2020.)

Q:Does Regulation Z require that a Closing Disclosure be provided within a certain timeframe after the Loan Estimate has been provided?  My bank has an applicant who has received the Loan Estimate but now wants to delay closing for a month.

A:There is no timing requirement for provision of the Closing Disclosure after the Loan Estimate has been issued. Regulation Z requires that the consumer receive the Closing Disclosure no later than three business days before consummation. It would be prudent, however, for the bank to monitor the file in the event an invoice or information about increased or additional fee(s) is received in the interim in which case the bank must reissue the Loan Estimate within the regulatory timeframes to pass the fee(s) on to the consumer. (Answer provided December 2020.)

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, senior compliance analyst, ABA Regulatory Policy and Compliance. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Credit reportingMilitary bankingTILA-RESPA integrated disclosures
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Research roundup: ABA holds policymakers accountable with independent analyses of key banking issues

Senate passes ABA-advocated ‘trigger leads’ bill

Mortgage
June 13, 2025

The Senate granted unanimous consent to S. 1467, an ABA-advocated bill that would would prevent credit reporting agencies from selling so-called mortgage trigger leads to lenders in most circumstances.

Fifth Circuit grants ABA mandamus, vacates transfer order for second time

ABA, CBA support maintaining confidentiality of CFPB nonbank risk determinations

Compliance and Risk
June 12, 2025

The American Bankers Association, joined by the Consumer Bankers Association, expressed support for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposal to maintain the confidentiality of decisions to exercise the agency’s supervisory authority over a nonbank entity that may pose...

ABA experts see reasons for optimism amid economic, regulatory uncertainty

ABA experts see reasons for optimism amid economic, regulatory uncertainty

Compliance and Risk
June 11, 2025

The Trump administration has rolled back a broad range of banking guidance and regulatory proposals made in the last few years, and while bankers are used to regulatory whiplash when administrations change, it is possible some of changes...

House panel advances ABA-backed bills on trigger leads, other topics

House panel advances ABA-backed bills on trigger leads, other topics

Community Banking
June 11, 2025

In a memo sent in advance of the markup, ABA noted that H.R. 2808 would “curb the abusive use of mortgage credit ‘trigger leads’ while narrowly preserving them for legitimate, transparent and accountable uses.”

ABA’s Nichols: Banking sector seeing positive policy developments

ABA’s Nichols: Banking sector seeing positive policy developments

Compliance and Risk
June 11, 2025

The banking sector has seen many constructive, positive policy developments at the federal level so far this year, and top officials have expressed their willingness to work with and engage with bankers on those issues, ABA President and...

Report: Synthetic identity fraud on rise

ABA Fraudcast: Federal data points to need for united response to fraud

Compliance and Risk
June 11, 2025

Telecoms and Meta are avoiding addressing serious challenges. And it's time to set up a family password.

NEWSBYTES

ABA, associations urge CFPB to rescind changes to adjudication process

June 13, 2025

ABA DataBank: May inflation cooler than expected, but still above Fed’s 2% target

June 13, 2025

Consumer sentiment rebounds in June

June 13, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025
Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

March 15, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025

Podcast: What bankers need to know about ‘First Amendment audits’

June 5, 2025

Podcast: Accelerating banking for quick-service restaurants

May 8, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.