ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: November 2025

Can Loan Operating System (LOS) service provider contacts create RESPA Section 8 issues for banks?

November 17, 2025
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Compliance question of the month: February 2025

Our mortgage loan origination system (LOS) provider’s online application portal now includes a link that consumers can use to request a quote from a property insurance broker on behalf of multiple carriers not affiliated with the bank. If the consumer accepts an insurance offer, the necessary information can be sent directly to the loan portal. Our LOS provider and the property insurance broker contracted to have this feature embedded into the LOS system; our bank did not request it.

The LOS provider has provided assurances that this arrangement does not violate RESPA Section 8, which prohibits fees or kickbacks in exchange for referrals and the payment of unearned fees in connection with real estate settlement services and related loan transactions. The LOS provider states that there is no violation of RESPA Section 8 because all parties pay fair market value for services actually performed, no “thing of value” is provided to the bank in exchange for a referral of property insurance business, and this arrangement benefits the consumer by facilitating the process of shopping for insurance.

Q In addition to discussing this with our primary regulator, what additional measures might we consider to mitigate the risks of a RESPA Section 8 or other legal violation?

A Based on the facts provided, the bank does not appear to be in violation of RESPA Section 8 as it is not giving or accepting any unearned fee, kickback or other thing of value in connection with this arrangement. However, to further mitigate potential legal concerns, the bank should consider taking the following actions:

  1. Discuss with the LOS provider whether the bank might simply decline to offer this solicitation opportunity and have this link removed;
  2. Develop disclosures that explain to the consumer the optional nature of this referral opportunity and the relationships of the parties involved;
  3. Ensure that strong vendor management protocols exist, including a thorough review for any RESPA Section 8 issues, and that the contract between the LOS provider and bank is structured in a manner that addresses RESPA compliance. For example, the bank should ensure it does not benefit—or “receive a thing of value”—in connection with the contract between the LOS provider and the insurance broker to embed the broker’s link in the LOS; and
  4. In addition to these legal considerations, the bank should also assess whether it is comfortable, from a reputational standpoint, in referring business to the insurance broker, and carriers in turn, and potentially to other settlement service providers if the LOS provider were to expand these types of partnerships.

For more information, contact ABA’s Terry Hollinger.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

Tags: Compliance
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: March 30

Uncategorized
March 30, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: March 23

Uncategorized
March 23, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Compliance question of the month: February 2025

Compliance question of the month: March 2026

Uncategorized
March 23, 2026

Compliance QOTM answers question on CRA public file.

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: March 16

Uncategorized
March 16, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

ABA Washington Summit begins today

ABA Washington Summit begins today

Uncategorized
March 9, 2026

More than 1,400 bank leaders from across the country are gathered in Washington, D.C. this week for the 2026 ABA Washington Summit. ABA will livestream the Tuesday and Wednesday general sessions on its X account, starting around 8:30...

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: March 9

Uncategorized
March 9, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

NEWSBYTES

Rep. Hill: Expect CFPB reforms later this year

March 31, 2026

Consumer confidence rose in March

March 31, 2026

OCC: Bank trading revenue $14.9B in Q4 2025

March 31, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Check Fraud Is Outpacing Legacy Controls. What Banks Should Evaluate Now.

Check Fraud Is Outpacing Legacy Controls. What Banks Should Evaluate Now.

April 1, 2026
How top agricultural lenders are approaching AI, automation and innovation in 2026

How top agricultural lenders are approaching AI, automation and innovation in 2026

March 2, 2026
Top 7 FP&A Trends in Banking for 2026

Top 7 FP&A Trends in Banking for 2026

March 1, 2026
How Instant Payments Can Accelerate B2B Payments Modernization

How Instant Payments Can Accelerate B2B Payments Modernization

February 3, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Are credit union commercial loans risky business?

March 30, 2026

Podcast: Risk and strategy in sponsor banking

March 19, 2026

Podcast: From stablecoin to fraud, top takeaways from the 2026 ABA Summit

March 13, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.