ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Compliance and Risk

ABA Compliance Center Inbox, March/April 2018

March 12, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read

Q We recently acquired another financial institution. Its loan portfolio contains home equity loans with prepayment penalty clauses. We would like to remove the prepayment penalty clause or not charge borrowers the prepayment penalty. If we can do either, are we required to send a notice to all affected borrowers that the prepayment penalty will not be charged if they pay off the loan early? Or, since this practice will be more favorable to borrowers, can we just forego notice and not charge customers if they pay off early?

A No, you are not required to send a notice about the removal of the prepayment penalty provision and yes, you may simply not charge customers who repay early.

Under §1026.40(f)(3)(iv) regarding limitations on home equity plans, creditors may “make a change that will unequivocally benefit the consumer throughout the remainder of the plan.” Under §1026.9(c)(1)(ii), creditors are not required to provide a change in terms notice “when the change involves a reduction of any component of a finance or other charge.” Clearly, elimination of the prepayment penalty fee is a reduction of a charge. (Response provided Nov. 2017.)

Q We are working with an outside attorney who is helping us with a commercial loan restructuring. The loan will be secured by commercial real estate and equipment. The attorney has offered to order the appraisal. Can the attorney order the appraisal for us?

A It depends. Attorneys may order the appraisal if the bank is the client, but they may not if the bank’s client is the attorney’s client. Even if outside attorneys working on behalf of the bank are permitted to order the appraisal, it does not mean that they should in all cases. It may depend in part on how the attorneys are compensated. If they are compensated on a per-loan or per job basis, then they are part of the loan production function, and their independence may be questionable.

According to the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines: “Because the appraisal and evaluation process is an integral component of the credit underwriting process, it should be isolated from influence by the institution’s loan production process. An appraiser and an individual providing evaluation services should be independent of the loan, collection functions of the institution and have no interest, financial or otherwise, in the property or the transaction. If absolute lines of independence cannot be achieved, an institution must be able to clearly demonstrate that it has prudent safeguards to isolate its collateral evaluation process from influence or interference from the loan production process.” (Response provided Nov. 2017.)

Q Our holding company is revising its letterhead. 
Should its stationery include “Member FDIC”?

 

A No. It is not required because the FDIC membership logo and statement are not required on any stationery, including bank stationery. Section 328.3(d)(2) lists the types of advertisements that do not require the official advertising statement: “The following types of advertisements do not require use of the official advertising statement, which includes: (2) Insured depository institution supplies such as stationery (except when used for circular letters), envelopes, deposit slips, checks, drafts, signature cards, deposit passbooks, certificates of deposit, etc.”

That is not to say that the use is prohibited, however, but there may be some risks. For example, if the stationery might be used to promote non-FDIC insured products and services, it may not be a good idea to have the FDIC logo as part of the letterhead. (Response provided Nov. 2017.)

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance outreach and development; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, compliance analyst, ABA Center for Regulatory Compliance. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.

Tags: AppraisalsMarketing
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

OCC’s Gould: Bank regulation should not distract banks from business challenges

Gould suggests easing bank resolution planning requirements

Compliance and Risk
January 16, 2026

Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould said he sees no benefit in the FDIC continuing to require filings from large banks that detail their suggested orderly resolution in case of a bank failure, known as CIDI plans. He...

FHFA to create affordable housing advisory committee

HUD proposes to remove disparate impact from Fair Housing Act rule

Compliance and Risk
January 14, 2026

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is proposing to rescind three rules allowing the use of disparate impact in determining Fair Housing Act violations.

AI romance, ‘machine-to-machine’ scams among top 2026 fraud trends

AI romance, ‘machine-to-machine’ scams among top 2026 fraud trends

Compliance and Risk
January 14, 2026

Romance scams carried out by artificial intelligence and computers scamming other computers are among the top five fraud trends to watch out for in 2026, according to a new report by credit reporting agency Experian.

FinCEN proposes applying BSA requirements to investment advisers

G7 expert group releases cybersecurity ‘roadmap’ for post-quantum cryptography

Compliance and Risk
January 13, 2026

The G7 Cyber Expert Group released a “roadmap” to help the financial sector take steps to secure computer systems from cybersecurity risks arising from quantum computing.

Banking agencies: Shared National Credit quality remains moderate

Banking agencies release Shared National Credit Program report

Compliance and Risk
January 12, 2026

Credit risk associated with large, syndicated bank loans remains moderate, with credit risk trends reflecting the effects of borrowers' ability to manage higher interest expenses and other macroeconomic factors, three banking agencies said in their most recent Shared...

ABA urges FinCEN to reevaluate BOI collection burden on banks

Treasury issues order, alert to Minnesota institutions on alleged fraud rings

Compliance and Risk
January 9, 2026

FinCEN issued an alert urging financial institutions to identify and report fraud associated with federal child nutrition programs in Minnesota, and it released a geographic targeting order directing banks and money transmitters in two Minnesota counties to report...

NEWSBYTES

Democratic senators introduce bill to lower credit card late fee cap

January 16, 2026

Gould suggests easing bank resolution planning requirements

January 16, 2026

Survey: Merchants expand payment options, express interest in crypto

January 16, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

November 1, 2025
5 FedNow®  Service Developments You May Have Missed

5 FedNow® Service Developments You May Have Missed

October 31, 2025

Cash, Security, and Resilience in a Digital-First Economy

October 20, 2025
Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

October 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: A Lone Star banking perspective

January 15, 2026

Podcast: The incredible shrinking penny (circulation)

January 8, 2026

Podcast: Cybersecurity in a mobile-first banking landscape

December 18, 2025

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.