ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Compliance and Risk

ABA Compliance Center Inbox, March/April 2018

March 12, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read

Q We recently acquired another financial institution. Its loan portfolio contains home equity loans with prepayment penalty clauses. We would like to remove the prepayment penalty clause or not charge borrowers the prepayment penalty. If we can do either, are we required to send a notice to all affected borrowers that the prepayment penalty will not be charged if they pay off the loan early? Or, since this practice will be more favorable to borrowers, can we just forego notice and not charge customers if they pay off early?

A No, you are not required to send a notice about the removal of the prepayment penalty provision and yes, you may simply not charge customers who repay early.

Under §1026.40(f)(3)(iv) regarding limitations on home equity plans, creditors may “make a change that will unequivocally benefit the consumer throughout the remainder of the plan.” Under §1026.9(c)(1)(ii), creditors are not required to provide a change in terms notice “when the change involves a reduction of any component of a finance or other charge.” Clearly, elimination of the prepayment penalty fee is a reduction of a charge. (Response provided Nov. 2017.)

Q We are working with an outside attorney who is helping us with a commercial loan restructuring. The loan will be secured by commercial real estate and equipment. The attorney has offered to order the appraisal. Can the attorney order the appraisal for us?

A It depends. Attorneys may order the appraisal if the bank is the client, but they may not if the bank’s client is the attorney’s client. Even if outside attorneys working on behalf of the bank are permitted to order the appraisal, it does not mean that they should in all cases. It may depend in part on how the attorneys are compensated. If they are compensated on a per-loan or per job basis, then they are part of the loan production function, and their independence may be questionable.

According to the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines: “Because the appraisal and evaluation process is an integral component of the credit underwriting process, it should be isolated from influence by the institution’s loan production process. An appraiser and an individual providing evaluation services should be independent of the loan, collection functions of the institution and have no interest, financial or otherwise, in the property or the transaction. If absolute lines of independence cannot be achieved, an institution must be able to clearly demonstrate that it has prudent safeguards to isolate its collateral evaluation process from influence or interference from the loan production process.” (Response provided Nov. 2017.)

Q Our holding company is revising its letterhead. 
Should its stationery include “Member FDIC”?

 

A No. It is not required because the FDIC membership logo and statement are not required on any stationery, including bank stationery. Section 328.3(d)(2) lists the types of advertisements that do not require the official advertising statement: “The following types of advertisements do not require use of the official advertising statement, which includes: (2) Insured depository institution supplies such as stationery (except when used for circular letters), envelopes, deposit slips, checks, drafts, signature cards, deposit passbooks, certificates of deposit, etc.”

That is not to say that the use is prohibited, however, but there may be some risks. For example, if the stationery might be used to promote non-FDIC insured products and services, it may not be a good idea to have the FDIC logo as part of the letterhead. (Response provided Nov. 2017.)

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance outreach and development; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, compliance analyst, ABA Center for Regulatory Compliance. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: AppraisalsMarketing
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA donates to Texas flood relief efforts, urges bankers to contribute

FDIC issues regulatory relief guidance for Texas

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

The FDIC released guidance with steps intended to provide regulatory relief to financial institutions and facilitate recovery in areas of Texas recently affected by severe storms and flooding.

BIS drafts guidance for central banks on AI adoption

BIS releases report on connections between banks and nonbanks

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

Differences between regulations for banks and those for nonbank financial intermediaries may have created incentives to shift business activities to the NBFI sector, so bank supervisors should apply “close scrutiny” to such interactions, according to the report.

Regulators take issue with discrimination definition in proposed appraisal standards

HUD reverses Biden-era policies on appraisal review

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

HUD eliminated several of the core policies adopted by the Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity task force, an interagency group of 13 federal agencies formed during the Biden administration to address alleged discrimination in the appraisal process.

Fed releases agenda for upcoming conference on large bank capital requirements

Fed seeks public input on large bank rating system revision

Compliance and Risk
July 10, 2025

The Federal Reserve requested comment on a proposal to revise its supervisory rating framework for large bank holding companies to address the "well managed" status of the firms.

FinCEN, IRS-CI launch series to help banks combat fentanyl trafficking

FinCEN extends compliance dates for fentanyl orders

Compliance and Risk
July 9, 2025

FinCEN has extended by more than a month the effective dates for orders involving three Mexico-based financial institutions with alleged ties to fentanyl trafficking, according to an agency statement.

ABA Regulatory Policy and Compliance Inbox: Must banks disclose all co-branding relationships?

ABA Regulatory Policy and Compliance Inbox: Just what is reportable under CRA?

Compliance and Risk
July 9, 2025

What about refinances and renewals for small business, small farm and community development loans? And: Understanding risk-based pricing notices.

NEWSBYTES

ABA, associations seek clarity about Fannie, Freddie credit scoring change

July 11, 2025

ABA DataBank: Copper prices rise on tariff announcement

July 11, 2025

FDIC issues regulatory relief guidance for Texas

July 11, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.