ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Legal

Highway Robbery

May 1, 2017
Reading Time: 3 mins read

By Dawn Causey, Tom Pinder and Andrew Doersam

The term “highway robbery” originated in the 17th century to describe the actions of bold and shameless outlaws who preyed on unlucky pilgrims traversing the plains. On December 4, 2015, select banks experienced 21st century highway robbery when Congress and the president enacted the bold and shameless Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, legislation that literally steals the capital of select Federal Reserve member banks to fund national highways. Appalled at the government’s brazen heist, on February 8, 2017, the American Bankers Association and Seattle-based Washington Federal fought back by filing suit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

The complaint against the government alleges breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and taking of private property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The reason the suit was filed in the Court of Federal Claims rather than federal district court is that, pursuant to the Tucker Act, the Court of Federal Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over takings and breach of contract claims for money damages. The purpose of the complaint is to obtain money damages because these damages are the only available remedy for breach of contract and uncompensated takings.

In passing the FAST Act, Congress broke the government’s promise to pay all banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System a fixed annual dividend of 6 percent on stock purchased in one of 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks. Congress established the Fed through the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which mandated that banks purchase stocks to fund the Fed. Since then, banks that join the Fed are required to buy shares of stock from their local Federal Reserve Bank. Unlike most bank capital, the Fed shares can never be sold, traded or used as collateral. To temper the Fed’s onerous capital requirements, Congress promised an annual 6 percent dividend on bank holdings of Fed stock as an incentive for banks to join the Fed.

The government honored the membership agreement and paid the 6 percent dividend for 105 years, until shortsighted lawmakers concocted the FAST Act.

The legislation authorized the use of $305 billion from 2016 through 2020 for highway, motor vehicle safety and public transportation programs. To fund these nationwide transportation initiatives, the FAST Act targeted the 72 financial institutions with more than $10 billion in assets and permanently reduced the 6 percent dividend promised to those institutions. The act imposed a new variable dividend rate of approximately 2 percent in 2016. This lower dividend rate resulted in the transfer of approximately $1.1 billion from these targeted member bank stockholders to the United States Treasury in 2016 to help pay for our country’s highways, and that figure is expected to balloon to $17 billion over a 10-year period.

ABA’s lawsuit seeks to reimburse banks for the government’s unprecedented reduction of the dividend payments owed to the affected institutions, because neither Congress nor the Fed can break its contracts with banks or seize funds without adequate restitution.

For example, Washington Federal paid more than $24 million and agreed to become a member of the Federal Reserve System. In return, the government issued 479,610 shares of stock to Washington Federal in exchange for the promised six percent dividend. Thanks to the FAST Act, Washington Federal’s first dividend payment was reduced by more than $900,000.

Pilgrims learned that the best way to combat highway robbers was to travel in large groups and avoid traveling alone. Let’s hope the FAST Act’s thievery serves as a wake-up call to banks that our industry is much stronger when we fight together.

Dawn Causey is general counsel at ABA, where Tom Pinder is SVP for litigation and Andrew Doersam is a paralegal.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Fed dividends
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

CFPB releases mortgage servicing proposal, overhauls loss mitigation framework

ABA, associations seek clarity about Fannie, Freddie credit scoring change

Mortgage
July 11, 2025

The recent announcement that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will expand credit scoring options for mortgages is a promising first step in creating a scoring system to better serve creditworthy Americans, but there remain several questions about how...

BIS drafts guidance for central banks on AI adoption

BIS releases report on connections between banks and nonbanks

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

Differences between regulations for banks and those for nonbank financial intermediaries may have created incentives to shift business activities to the NBFI sector, so bank supervisors should apply “close scrutiny” to such interactions, according to the report.

Regulators take issue with discrimination definition in proposed appraisal standards

HUD reverses Biden-era policies on appraisal review

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

HUD eliminated several of the core policies adopted by the Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity task force, an interagency group of 13 federal agencies formed during the Biden administration to address alleged discrimination in the appraisal process.

Budget bill narrowly passes Senate, moves back to House

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

ABA Banking Journal Podcast
July 10, 2025

Following the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, hear from ABA experts on how key ABA-supported provisions on tax policy, rural real estate and health savings accounts in the budget reconciliation law will affect banks.

Fed releases agenda for upcoming conference on large bank capital requirements

Fed seeks public input on large bank rating system revision

Compliance and Risk
July 10, 2025

The Federal Reserve requested comment on a proposal to revise its supervisory rating framework for large bank holding companies to address the "well managed" status of the firms.

Senate Banking Committee advances OCC, SEC nominations

Senate confirms Gould as comptroller of the currency

Newsbytes
July 10, 2025

The Senate voted to confirm Jonathan Gould as comptroller of the currency. He succeeds Rodney Hood, who is acting comptroller.

NEWSBYTES

ABA, associations seek clarity about Fannie, Freddie credit scoring change

July 11, 2025

ABA DataBank: Copper prices rise on tariff announcement

July 11, 2025

FDIC issues regulatory relief guidance for Texas

July 11, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.