ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Uncategorized

New York federal judge rules Fed master accounts are privilege, not a right

November 1, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
New York federal judge rules Fed master accounts are privilege, not a right

Master Accounts
Banco San Juan Internacional Inc. v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Date: Oct. 30, 2023

Issue: Whether a bank has a statutory right to a Federal Reserve master account.

Case Summary:  A Manhattan federal court ruled banks do not have a statutory right to Federal Reserve master accounts.

A master account is a type of bank account which grants access to the Federal Reserve’s payment networks. Without the account, banks are forced to rely on a partner bank for access. Master accounts are hosted at the Federal Reserve’s regional reserve banks such as the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY).

Banco San Juan Internacional Inc. (BSJI), a bank based in Puerto Rico, received its master account over a decade ago. Under the Federal Reserve’s guidelines, Master account applicants are placed into three tiers of scrutiny and reviewed for different types of risks. Prior to approval, BSJI was categorized in the high-risk tier because the bank is not federally supervised or insured. BSJI is organized under Puerto Rico laws as an International Banking Entity (IBE). IBEs are offshore financial institutions that federal authorities view as high risk for money laundering. In 2019, BSJI had its master account suspended for 22 months following a federal probe into credit agreements it had with state oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela. BSJI contended it improved its compliance during the suspension. However, FRBNY terminated BSJI’s master account following a federal crackdown on banks with links to Venezuela.

BSJI sued to prevent FRBNY from terminating its master account. BSJI argued FRBNY improperly targeted the bank because it was founded by a Venezuelan national more than 12 years ago, which BSJI asserted is patently unreasonable and unlawful. FRBNY contended it had the right to close BSJI’s master account, and the bank’s continued account access would create an unacceptable risk of facilitating illicit activity.

BSJI filed a motion for preliminary injunction, claiming it has a statutory right to have a master account, and FRBNY’s actions violated the Administrative Procedure Act. BSJI also claimed closing its master account and terminating its access to the Federal Reserve System’s services would cause the bank irreparable harm.

Judge John Koetl of the Manhattan federal court denied BSJI’s motion for preliminary injunction, ruling BSJI was not likely to succeed on the merits. The court emphasized Section 342 of the Federal Reserve Act makes clear that Federal Reserve banks are authorized to maintain master account but are not required to do so. The court also explained FRBNY executed a Master Account Agreement and Supplemental Terms with BSJI, and both agreements gave FRBNY the contractual right to close BSJI’s master account.

The court also concluded BSJI’s claim that it would suffer irreparable harm was based on speculation rather than concrete evidence. BSJI alleged it would lose its customers without the existence of a master account. In support, BSJI highlighted the 22-month period in which its master account was suspended and alleged the loss of access caused enormous reputational and financial harm. The court explained BSJI’s current small customer base consists of only 14 account holders comprised almost exclusively of close family members of the owner and the offshore entities they control. Further, the court concluded the bank’s account base remained with the bank despite its prior lengthy existence without a master account. As a result, the court concluded the allegations that BSJI would lose its current customers were “self-serving speculation.”

Bottom Line: BSJI filed to appeal the denial. The bank will seek “interim relief” from the Second Circuit.

Documents: Memo

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Compliance question of the month: February 2025

Compliance question of the month: May 2025

Uncategorized
May 19, 2025

Compliance QOTM answers question on disclosure for large deposits under Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act).

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: May 19

Uncategorized
May 19, 2025

The Office of Foreign Assets Control announced the following sanctions action.

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: May 5

Uncategorized
May 5, 2025

The Office of Foreign Assets Control announced the following sanctions action last week.

Fourth Circuit rules 1st Advantage Federal Credit Union not liable for fraudulent transfer

Fourth Circuit rules 1st Advantage Federal Credit Union not liable for fraudulent transfer

Uncategorized
May 1, 2025

In a 3-0 decision, a Fourth Circuit panel ruled that financial institutions are not liable for fund transfers where the beneficiary name and account number do not match, unless the institution knew the mismatch at the time of...

ABA, trade groups file amicus brief supporting Bank of America in National Bank Act preemption lawsuit

Bank of America to pay FDIC $540M for allegedly underpaid premiums

Uncategorized
May 1, 2025

A Washington D.C. federal court granted the FDIC partial summary judgment, ruling that Bank of America must pay $540 million for allegedly underpaying its quarterly premiums from 2013 to 2014.

Fifth Circuit grants ABA mandamus, vacates transfer order for second time

D.C. Circuit panel modifies its partial stay, bars CFPB mass layoffs

Uncategorized
May 1, 2025

Following the evidentiary hearing, the court will determine whether the CFPB violated the preliminary injunction. In the meantime, the bureau is barred from carrying out its RIF.

NEWSBYTES

#PracticeSafeChecks campaign wins two Telly Awards

May 21, 2025

Proposed amendment would add credit card rate cap to Senate stablecoin bill

May 21, 2025

ABA, associations urge senators to reject adding credit card routing mandates to stablecoin bill

May 21, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025
Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

March 15, 2025
AI for Banks: A Starter Guide for Community and Regional Institutions

AI for Banks: A Starter Guide for Community and Regional Institutions

March 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Accelerating banking for quick-service restaurants

May 8, 2025

How a Georgia community bank supports government-guaranteed lending nationwide

May 1, 2025

Podcast: Quantum computing’s shakeup in payments, cybersecurity

April 24, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.