ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Uncategorized

Federal court rules Ripple’s sale of XRP on crypto exchanges are not securities transactions

August 1, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
ABA seeks level playing field in digital asset regulation

Cryptocurrency
SEC v. Ripple Labs Inc.
Date: June 14, 2023

Issue: Whether Ripple Labs Inc.’s sales and distribution of the XRP digital token constituted the sale of unregistered securities.

‌Case Summary:  A Manhattan (New York) federal district court determined Ripple’s “institutional sales” of XRP violated the Securities Act of 1933, but all other ways Ripple sold or distributed XRP did not.

Ripple is a technology company which operates as an enterprise blockchain company. The company’s mission is to realize an “Internet of Value” by using technology to facilitate the transfer of value across the internet. Ripple offers XRP, a cryptocurrency token designed to provide an energy-efficient alternative to other blockchain tokens.

The Securities & Exchange Committee (SEC) launched an enforcement action against Ripple in 2020. The SEC alleged Ripple engaged in the unregistered offer and sale of securities by offering XRP to investors. SEC alleged Ripple engaged in three categories of unregistered XRP offers and sales from 2013 to the end of 2020. First, SEC alleged Ripple made “Institutional Sales” by selling XRP to institutional investors, such as hedge funds, and institutional buyers to raise money to finance its operations and build a global payments network. Ripple allegedly raised approximately $728.9 million through these Institutional Sales. Second, SEC alleged Ripple made “programmatic sales” by selling XRP on digital asset exchanges or through trading algorithms. Ripple allegedly sold $757.6 million of XRP in Programmatic Sales and used the proceeds to fund its operations. Third, SEC alleged Ripple made “other distributions” when it distributed XRP as a form of payment for services, including employee compensation and payments to fund third parties to develop new applications for XRP and the XRP ledger.

SEC sued Ripple alleging its sales and distributions were unlawful offers and sales of securities in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act. According to SEC, Ripple sold XRP as an “investment contract” which is a security as defined by the Securities Act. Ripple contended it did not sell XRP as an investment contract, and therefore no registration statement was required. The primary test for determining whether a given digital asset constitutes an investment contract, and therefore a security, is the “Howey test” established in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. Under the Howey test, an investment contact exists “when a person: (i) invests his money, (ii) in a common enterprise, and (iii) is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party.”

Delivering a split decision on competing summary judgment motions, the court found XRP, as a digital token, is not a contract, transaction, or scheme to qualify as an investment contract under the Howey test. The court rejected the token-as-security argument for XRP and assessed the totality of the circumstances for each type of transaction at issue. The court found that two of the three categories of XRP transactions did not involve securities to trigger liability under federal securities laws.

The court determined Ripple’s Institutional Sales of XRP constituted an investment contract and violated the Securities Act. The court found each element of Howey satisfied, ruling the evidence supported an investment of money by the institutional investors; “horizontal commonality” between Ripple and the Institutional Sales investors based on a pooling of investor funds tied to the success of the common enterprise; and Ripple’s communications, marketing campaign, and the nature of the Institutional Sales would lead a reasonable investor to have an expectation of profits based on Ripple’s efforts.

However, the court ruled Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP did not constitute an investment contract. The court determined the third prong of the Howey test was not met because the Programmatic Sales were blind bid/ask transactions, and investors could not know the seller from which they XRP. According to the court, institutional buyers knowingly purchased XRP directly from Ripple under a contract, but programmatic buyers did not know to whom or what it was paying its money.” For this reason, buyers were not led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party, and thus the transaction was not an investment contract.

Finally, the court concluded the “other distributions of XRP to employees and third parties as compensation did not satisfy the Howey Test because these distributions did not involve an investment of money.

Bottom Line: The SEC has appealed the district court’s decision. While this is a major ruling, it is not binding on other district courts, even those in the Southern District of New York.

Documents: Opinion

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: July 14

Uncategorized
July 14, 2025

The Office of Foreign Assets Control announced the following sanctions action last week.

Terrorism and money laundering aggregates published: April through June 2024

Terrorism and money laundering aggregates published: April through June 2025

Uncategorized
July 7, 2025

The FinCEN 314(a) Updates section is published on a periodic basis to better capture the trend line for 314(a) usage. The following is an update from April through June 2025.

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: July 7

Uncategorized
July 7, 2025

The Office of Foreign Assets Control announced the following sanctions action last week.

ABA files coalition amicus brief urging Supreme Court to reject class certification for uninjured class members

U.S. Supreme Court declines to address class certification for uninjured members

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Labcorp’s appeal as “improvidently granted,” effectively letting stand the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that upheld class certification despite including uninjured members.

Capital One agrees to pay $425 million to resolve 360 Performance Savings Account allegations

Virginia federal court trims influencers lawsuit against Capital One

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

A Virginia federal court partially granted a motion to dismiss filed by a class of social media influencers alleging Capital One’s coupon-search browser extension stole from content creators.

First Circuit rules federal law does not preempt Puerto Rico’s credit card surcharge law

First Circuit rules federal law does not preempt Puerto Rico’s credit card surcharge law

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

In a unanimous decision, a First Circuit panel ruled that Puerto Rico’s Law 150 is not preempted by the Cash Discount Act or the Durbin Amendment.

NEWSBYTES

ABA offers fixes for small-business lending data collection rule

July 18, 2025

ABA DataBank: Retail sales rebounded in June

July 18, 2025

CFPB to keep notification procedures for state enforcement of consumer law

July 18, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

The future of careers in risk and compliance

July 17, 2025

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.