ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Compliance and Risk

My Bank Received a Subpoena For Customer Records—How Do I Respond?

July 11, 2019
Reading Time: 5 mins read

QMy bank received a civil subpoena for records pertaining to one of our customers. The subpoena asked if the bank had filed “any” reports with government agencies pursuant to this customer’s activities. The subpoena did not ask specifically if we filed a suspicious activity report, so it seems that citing the SAR non-disclosure provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act hints that we did indeed file. How should we respond? 

ACiting the specific non-disclosure provisions of the law implies there is a SAR. It’s not settled law, but the consensus seems to be that such a citation is best avoided. The response should be that your bank is complying, to the best of its ability. The bank needs to consult an attorney familiar with these types of subpoenas, as each court has its own protocols. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QUsing FICO scores as part of the selection criteria, the bank sent prescreened offers of credit to those with higher FICO scores. The offer stated an annual percentage rate. If a recipient applied for the loan, the bank—in some cases—honored the APR stated in the offer even if the applicant’s FICO score had dropped since the prescreening. However, if the FICO score had dropped significantly, the bank issued a denial. The bank did not provide risk–based pricing notices to these customers, since the ultimate credit score did not affect the pricing. The bank’s auditor is now questioning whether the bank complied with Regulation V’s requirements to provide risk-based pricing notices. Was this process compliant?  

AYes. Regulation V’s §1022.72(a) provides that (unless an exception applies) risk-based price notices are required if the creditor uses a consumer report (including a FICO score) in connection with an application of consumer credit and, based in whole or in part on that report, grants credit to the applicant on material terms that are materially less favorable than the most favorable material terms available to a substantial proportion of consumer from that creditor. The key words here are “grants credit.” In this case, the bank denied the credit based on the score. Indeed, the bank did not use any form of risk-based pricing. It applied a single APR to all of those who received credit. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QThe 2018 amendments to the TILA–RESPA integrated disclosure rule allow revisions to the Closing Disclosure for valid changed circumstances. The bank is considering issuing the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate. The bank is aware that other lenders issue Closing Disclosures almost immediately after loan approval and issuance of the Loan Estimate which means, in most cases, the fees on the Closing Disclosure are based upon the best information available standard and most likely do not reflect the actual terms of the transaction. 

Is it acceptable to issue the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate based on the best information available at that time and still be compliant?  

 ANo. It is clear in Regulation Z §1026.19(f)(1) that “the actual terms of the transaction” must be disclosed on the closing disclosure. In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has emphasized the importance of accuracy on the Closing Disclosure. For example: “The Bureau will continue to monitor the market for practices that do not comply with the rule’s Closing Disclosure accuracy standard” (emphasis added). 

The bureau agrees with commenters who stated that the practice of providing very early Closing Disclosures with terms that are nearly certain to be revised would be contrary to the underlying purpose of the closing disclosure (emphasis added). (Response provided March 2019)  

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance outreach and development; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, senior compliance analyst, ABA Regulatory Compliance and Policy. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.   

Tags: Credit scoringSuspicious Activity ReportsTILA-RESPA integrated disclosures
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

FCC proposes ‘robocall scorecard’ to rate voice service providers

ABA, associations urge FCC to adopt outcome-based robocall scorecard

Compliance and Risk
September 22, 2026

ABA joined other financial services associations to express strong support for the Federal Communications Commission’s proposed Robocall Mitigation Scorecard while recommending changes to ensure it provides consumers and businesses with meaningful information about voice service providers’ effectiveness in...

Fed releases agenda for upcoming conference on large bank capital requirements

Fed’s Jefferson provides update on discount window modernization

Compliance and Risk
September 22, 2026

In recent years, the Federal Reserve has taken steps to improve the discount window’s business operations, enhance its user experience, and boost collaboration with the Federal Home Loan Banks to increase how quickly banks can access liquidity, Fed...

FTC warns consumers about social media check fraud scam

ABA survey: Voters overwhelmingly support legislation to crack down on fraudulent social media ads

Compliance and Risk
September 22, 2026

Americans overwhelmingly support congressional efforts to crack down on fraudulent ads on social media platforms and hold online companies accountable for preventing scams, according to a new national survey of registered voters conducted by Fabrizio Ward on behalf...

BIS: Stablecoins fail as ‘sound money’

ABA, BPI seek regulatory consistency in proposed stablecoin reporting forms

Compliance and Risk
September 21, 2026

The FDIC should finalize reporting forms for stablecoin issuers only after it finalizes the regulatory requirements for those firms, and it should collaborate with other federal regulators to ensure all reporting forms are substantially similar, ABA and the...

New report, webinar explore trusted digital identities in financial services

Balancing security with customer experience

Compliance and Risk
September 21, 2026

The banking, technology and government sectors have been collaborating as new technologies lower the barriers to creating convincing false identities.

Post-mortem reports on bank failures highlight supervisory missteps, call for changes

Bowman: Independent review finds regulatory tailoring had no role in SVB failure

Compliance and Risk
September 18, 2026

Delays in supervisory action ahead of the Silicon Valley Bank failure were not caused by regulatory tailoring mandates, despite an earlier Federal Reserve report alleging they were, Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said, citing preliminary results from...

NEWSBYTES

Senate bill would create process for raising bank regulatory thresholds

September 23, 2026

OCC releases mortgage performance report for Q2 2026

September 23, 2026

FHA proposes changes to single-family housing minimum property requirements

September 23, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Beyond the Portfolio: The Wealth Manager’s New Role in a Multigenerational World

Beyond the Portfolio: The Wealth Manager’s New Role in a Multigenerational World

September 17, 2026
Banking Technology at a Strategic Crossroads

Banking Technology at a Strategic Crossroads

September 8, 2026
Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

September 1, 2026
Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

September 1, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Making the jump from a high performer to a high-performing leader

September 16, 2026

Podcast: Remembering 9/11, a quarter century later

September 10, 2026

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.