ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Compliance and Risk

My Bank Received a Subpoena For Customer Records—How Do I Respond?

July 11, 2019
Reading Time: 5 mins read

QMy bank received a civil subpoena for records pertaining to one of our customers. The subpoena asked if the bank had filed “any” reports with government agencies pursuant to this customer’s activities. The subpoena did not ask specifically if we filed a suspicious activity report, so it seems that citing the SAR non-disclosure provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act hints that we did indeed file. How should we respond? 

ACiting the specific non-disclosure provisions of the law implies there is a SAR. It’s not settled law, but the consensus seems to be that such a citation is best avoided. The response should be that your bank is complying, to the best of its ability. The bank needs to consult an attorney familiar with these types of subpoenas, as each court has its own protocols. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QUsing FICO scores as part of the selection criteria, the bank sent prescreened offers of credit to those with higher FICO scores. The offer stated an annual percentage rate. If a recipient applied for the loan, the bank—in some cases—honored the APR stated in the offer even if the applicant’s FICO score had dropped since the prescreening. However, if the FICO score had dropped significantly, the bank issued a denial. The bank did not provide risk–based pricing notices to these customers, since the ultimate credit score did not affect the pricing. The bank’s auditor is now questioning whether the bank complied with Regulation V’s requirements to provide risk-based pricing notices. Was this process compliant?  

AYes. Regulation V’s §1022.72(a) provides that (unless an exception applies) risk-based price notices are required if the creditor uses a consumer report (including a FICO score) in connection with an application of consumer credit and, based in whole or in part on that report, grants credit to the applicant on material terms that are materially less favorable than the most favorable material terms available to a substantial proportion of consumer from that creditor. The key words here are “grants credit.” In this case, the bank denied the credit based on the score. Indeed, the bank did not use any form of risk-based pricing. It applied a single APR to all of those who received credit. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QThe 2018 amendments to the TILA–RESPA integrated disclosure rule allow revisions to the Closing Disclosure for valid changed circumstances. The bank is considering issuing the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate. The bank is aware that other lenders issue Closing Disclosures almost immediately after loan approval and issuance of the Loan Estimate which means, in most cases, the fees on the Closing Disclosure are based upon the best information available standard and most likely do not reflect the actual terms of the transaction. 

Is it acceptable to issue the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate based on the best information available at that time and still be compliant?  

 ANo. It is clear in Regulation Z §1026.19(f)(1) that “the actual terms of the transaction” must be disclosed on the closing disclosure. In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has emphasized the importance of accuracy on the Closing Disclosure. For example: “The Bureau will continue to monitor the market for practices that do not comply with the rule’s Closing Disclosure accuracy standard” (emphasis added). 

The bureau agrees with commenters who stated that the practice of providing very early Closing Disclosures with terms that are nearly certain to be revised would be contrary to the underlying purpose of the closing disclosure (emphasis added). (Response provided March 2019)  

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance outreach and development; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, senior compliance analyst, ABA Regulatory Compliance and Policy. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.   

Tags: Credit scoringSuspicious Activity ReportsTILA-RESPA integrated disclosures
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

FS-ISAC issues framework for increasing fraud, cybersecurity team collaboration

ABA endorses bill to crack down on social media scams

Compliance and Risk
February 6, 2026

Proposed legislation would provide “a strong framework” to improve social media companies’ urgency in removing fraudulent advertising, “stopping countless scams before they start,” ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols said in a letter to the bill’s sponsors.

Congressional resolution would overturn SEC cyber incident reporting rules

Congress reauthorizes private-public cybersecurity framework

Compliance and Risk
February 6, 2026

Lawmakers reauthorized a voluntary framework for the private sector and government agencies to share information about cyberthreats as part of a larger budget deal.

Treasury seeks comment on changes to foreign investor review process

Treasury seeks comment on changes to foreign investor review process

Compliance and Risk
February 6, 2026

The Treasury Department is seeking public input on the Known Investor Program and ways to potentially streamline aspects of its foreign investment review process.

Treasury Department awards grants to boost local economies after COVID

Bankers share ideas for strengthening communities in new report

Community Banking
February 5, 2026

The ABA Foundation unveiled a first-of-its-kind report capturing forward-looking ideas from bankers, community leaders and nonprofit partners on how financial institutions can drive meaningful economic and community impact in the decades ahead.

ABA Fraudcast: Taking the fraud prevention message directly to lawmakers

Podcast: How the SCAM Act would encourage platforms to go after scammers

ABA Banking Journal Podcast
February 4, 2026

Major tech platforms make billions of dollars from scammers who advertise on their sites, according to reporting from Reuters, and there’s not much incentive for them to change their practices — yet.

ABA, BPI seek transparency around Fed stress tests

Fed finalizes annual stress test scenarios for large banks

Compliance and Risk
February 4, 2026

The Federal Reserve finalized the hypothetical scenarios for its annual stress test for large banks. In addition, the Fed board voted to maintain the current stress capital buffer requirements until 2027.

NEWSBYTES

FDIC extends comment period for Genius Act implementation

February 6, 2026

ABA endorses bill to crack down on social media scams

February 6, 2026

Congress reauthorizes private-public cybersecurity framework

February 6, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

How Instant Payments Can Accelerate B2B Payments Modernization

How Instant Payments Can Accelerate B2B Payments Modernization

February 3, 2026
Digital Banking: The Gateway to Customer Growth and Competitive Differentiation

Digital Banking: The Gateway to Customer Growth and Competitive Differentiation

February 1, 2026
Planning Your 2026 Budget? Allocate Resources to Support Growth and Retention Goals

Why Every Digital Interaction Defines Your Brand Experience

February 1, 2026
Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

November 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: How the SCAM Act would encourage platforms to go after scammers

February 4, 2026

A new kind of ‘community bank’ for small businesses

January 22, 2026

Podcast: A Lone Star banking perspective

January 15, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.