ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Compliance and Risk

My Bank Received a Subpoena For Customer Records—How Do I Respond?

July 11, 2019
Reading Time: 5 mins read

QMy bank received a civil subpoena for records pertaining to one of our customers. The subpoena asked if the bank had filed “any” reports with government agencies pursuant to this customer’s activities. The subpoena did not ask specifically if we filed a suspicious activity report, so it seems that citing the SAR non-disclosure provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act hints that we did indeed file. How should we respond? 

ACiting the specific non-disclosure provisions of the law implies there is a SAR. It’s not settled law, but the consensus seems to be that such a citation is best avoided. The response should be that your bank is complying, to the best of its ability. The bank needs to consult an attorney familiar with these types of subpoenas, as each court has its own protocols. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QUsing FICO scores as part of the selection criteria, the bank sent prescreened offers of credit to those with higher FICO scores. The offer stated an annual percentage rate. If a recipient applied for the loan, the bank—in some cases—honored the APR stated in the offer even if the applicant’s FICO score had dropped since the prescreening. However, if the FICO score had dropped significantly, the bank issued a denial. The bank did not provide risk–based pricing notices to these customers, since the ultimate credit score did not affect the pricing. The bank’s auditor is now questioning whether the bank complied with Regulation V’s requirements to provide risk-based pricing notices. Was this process compliant?  

AYes. Regulation V’s §1022.72(a) provides that (unless an exception applies) risk-based price notices are required if the creditor uses a consumer report (including a FICO score) in connection with an application of consumer credit and, based in whole or in part on that report, grants credit to the applicant on material terms that are materially less favorable than the most favorable material terms available to a substantial proportion of consumer from that creditor. The key words here are “grants credit.” In this case, the bank denied the credit based on the score. Indeed, the bank did not use any form of risk-based pricing. It applied a single APR to all of those who received credit. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QThe 2018 amendments to the TILA–RESPA integrated disclosure rule allow revisions to the Closing Disclosure for valid changed circumstances. The bank is considering issuing the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate. The bank is aware that other lenders issue Closing Disclosures almost immediately after loan approval and issuance of the Loan Estimate which means, in most cases, the fees on the Closing Disclosure are based upon the best information available standard and most likely do not reflect the actual terms of the transaction. 

Is it acceptable to issue the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate based on the best information available at that time and still be compliant?  

 ANo. It is clear in Regulation Z §1026.19(f)(1) that “the actual terms of the transaction” must be disclosed on the closing disclosure. In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has emphasized the importance of accuracy on the Closing Disclosure. For example: “The Bureau will continue to monitor the market for practices that do not comply with the rule’s Closing Disclosure accuracy standard” (emphasis added). 

The bureau agrees with commenters who stated that the practice of providing very early Closing Disclosures with terms that are nearly certain to be revised would be contrary to the underlying purpose of the closing disclosure (emphasis added). (Response provided March 2019)  

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance outreach and development; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, senior compliance analyst, ABA Regulatory Compliance and Policy. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.   

Tags: Credit scoringSuspicious Activity ReportsTILA-RESPA integrated disclosures
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

OCC’s Gould defends charter approvals for crypto activity

OCC’s Gould defends charter approvals for crypto activity

Compliance and Risk
August 19, 2026

Noting more than half of recent bank charter applications received by his agency involve digital assets, Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould said his job isn’t about “incumbent protection” but rather preserving the integrity of the banking system.

FDIC issues relief guidance for Mississippi, Tennessee banks affected by storms

FDIC issues relief guidance for Mississippi, West Virginia banks affected by storms

Compliance and Risk
August 17, 2026

The FDIC released guidance with steps intended to provide regulatory relief to financial institutions and facilitate recovery in areas of Mississippi and West Virginia affected by severe storms.

Former OCC head: Bank regulators should return to focusing on core issues

ABA offers recommendations for changes to CAMELS rating system

Compliance and Risk
August 17, 2026

As regulators weigh changes to the CAMELS rating system, ABA said it supports revisions that prioritize safety and soundness but believes further changes should be made to make ratings more objective and predictable.

Treasury Department launches cybersecurity initiative for financial services

Bank survey finds widespread cybersecurity concerns among small business owners

Compliance and Risk
August 17, 2026

Eight-seven percent of small business owners believe a cyberattack could have severe financial consequences, with 84% believing it could damage their customer relationships.

Compliance Inbox: Responding to Section 314(a) requests

Compliance Inbox: Responding to Section 314(a) requests

Compliance and Risk
August 17, 2026

Banks should familiarize themselves with FinCEN’s 314(a) FAQs, and follow prescribed procedures to contact FinCEN.

Bill would strengthen criminal penalties for ATM robberies

State attorneys general express support for ATM crime bill

Compliance and Risk
August 14, 2026

Fifteen state attorneys general urged Congress to pass legislation ensuring that robberies of off-site ATMs carry the same legal consequences as bank robberies. ABA also supports the bill.

NEWSBYTES

OCC’s Gould defends charter approvals for crypto activity

August 19, 2026

California nonprofits sue to release CDFI Fund appropriations

August 19, 2026

FOMC minutes show uncertainty about inflation

August 19, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

The exam question a backup can’t answer

August 18, 2026
Beyond Surveillance: Rethinking Security for Modern Financial Institutions

Beyond Surveillance: Rethinking Security for Modern Financial Institutions

August 12, 2026
Relationship Banking at Scale: Why Banks Need The Digital Sales & Service Platform

Relationship Banking at Scale: Why Banks Need The Digital Sales & Service Platform

August 1, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

Examiners Are Now Looking at Your Non-Core Systems

June 11, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

Podcast: Tactics for meaningful strategic planning

July 28, 2026

Podcast: Why it might be time to revisit a key FDIC ratio

July 23, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.