ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Legal

Regulators’ Silence on Preemption Could Spell Troubles for Banks

July 2, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read

Gavel and book.

By Dawn Causey, Thomas Pinder and Andrew Doersam

The legal standard for federal preemption in banking was established by the U.S. Supreme Court case of Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson, which was later codified in Section 1044 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Barnett held that the National Bank Act preempts state laws that significantly interfere with a national bank’s exercise of its banking power. However, Section 1639d(g)(3) of Dodd-Frank complicated the issue in mortgage lending by allowing banks to pay interest on escrow accounts if required by state law. 

One such example is the recent decision by a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that reversed the dismissal by a district court judge in Lusnak v. Bank of America. In this case, the court ruled that the NBA did not preempt a California law requiring banks to pay interest on borrowers’ escrow accounts.

Plaintiff Donald Lusnak alleged that B of A violated California’s escrow interest law and the Truth in Lending Act by failing to pay interest on escrow account funds. B of A disagreed, asserting that state escrow laws requiring the payment of interest are preempted because they prevent or significantly interfere with the exercise of its banking powers and therefore are not “applicable” under Section 1639d(g)(3) of Dodd-Frank.

The court ruled to the contrary. It reasoned that the TILA requirement for “banks to pay interest on escrow account balances if prescribed by applicable State law” suggests that Congress did not view such laws as necessarily preventing or significantly interfering with a national bank’s operations. The categories of bank activities listed in the OCC’s current preemption rules have been treated as off-limits to state regulation. However, the Lusnak decision upended this approach, meaning that more tug-of-war battles will likely proceed. Breaking its silence, the OCC has stepped into the fray, supporting B of A for a rehearing en banc. 

Another battle is taking place in Colorado, where the state won its first match against fintech company Avant. In Meade v. Avant, the court limited the valid-when-made doctrine, which provides that a loan that is valid when it is made does not become invalid (i.e., usurious) when it is sold or assigned to a third party.

Avant is a Colorado state-supervised lender that entered into a lending program agreement with WebBank, a Utah-chartered industrial bank. Following a compliance examination, the state’s commercial code administrator brought suit against Avant in state court, alleging that Avant charged excess finance and delinquency charges in violation of Colorado law. 

Avant countered, seeking to remove the administrator’s claims to federal court. Avant argued that because a state-chartered bank originated the loans under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, federal law preempted Colorado state laws. However, the Colorado district court remanded the claim to state court. The court found that the FDIA did not completely preempt the administrator’s claims because the administrator’s claims, on their face, failed to raise a federal issue. The federal district court did not have jurisdiction over those claims.

ABA filed an amicus brief in the case contending that the administrator’s claims were an attack on the bank’s power to originate and sell loans and also on the long-standing “valid-when-made” rule. The court recognized the significance of that issue, but ruled that the valid-when-made rule is not relevant to the complete preemption argument. Yet the FDIC was conspicuously mute. 

The lack of participation of the federal banking agencies in these federal preemption cases appears to have emboldened the states to continue encroaching on the powers of banks under the NBA. If preemption teeters toward the states, banks of all charters could find themselves with greater compliance and other costs rather than focusing on empowering economic growth for their customers and communities.  

Dawn Causey is general counsel at the American Bankers Association, where Thomas Pinder is SVP for litigation and Andrew Doersam is a paralegal. 

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: FintechNational Bank Act
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

CFPB warns against collection of ‘legally invalid’ medical debt

Court vacates CFPB medical debt rule

Compliance and Risk
July 14, 2025

A federal court in Texas vacated the CFPB’s medical debt reporting rule after the bureau’s current leadership joined with plaintiffs in asking it to be struck down.

CFPB launches ‘tip line’ to report on bureau employees

ABA, associations urge CFPB to rescind changes to adjudication process

Legal
June 13, 2025

ABA joined three associations in voicing support for a CFPB proposal to rescind a set of changes to the bureau’s rules that, among other things, gave its director authority to resolve adjudication hearings overseen by the agency.

Acting OCC head discusses regulatory tailoring, bank merger reviews

OCC’s Hood affirms support for federal preemption

Legal
June 9, 2025

Acting Comptroller of the Currency Rodney Hood strongly affirmed the OCC’s continued support for federal preemption of state laws for national banks and federal thrifts, defending preemption as both lawful and pro-competitive.

SEC updates data breach standards for investment companies, advisers

CFPB asks court to vacate Section 1033 data sharing rule

Compliance and Risk
June 2, 2025

The CFPB has asked a federal court to vacate its rule on financial data sharing, citing the rule’s “numerous legal infirmities.”

Illinois lawmakers vote to delay implementation date for state interchange fee law

Illinois lawmakers vote to delay implementation date for state interchange fee law

Legal
June 1, 2025

The Illinois General Assembly approved legislation extending by a year the effective date of a first-of-its-kind state law restricting interchange fees.

Helping Home Buyers Navigate a Hot Housing Market

Reconsideration of value: A critical component of appraisal review

Compliance and Risk
May 28, 2025

Ensuring appraisals and other types of property valuations are accurate is not just about fair lending.

NEWSBYTES

House passes bills on stablecoins, digital assets, CBDCs

July 17, 2025

Business inventories hold steady in May

July 17, 2025

Mortgage rates rise

July 17, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

The future of careers in risk and compliance

July 17, 2025

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.