ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

ABA moves for summary judgment in Illinois interchange lawsuit

April 1, 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
ABA files coalition amicus brief urging Colorado District Court to grant preliminary injunction in rate opt-out lawsuit

Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act
Illinois Bankers Association v. Kwame Raoul, in his official capacity as Illinois attorney general
Date: March 17, 2025

Issue: Should the district court grant the American Bankers Association’s motion for summary judgment and permanently enjoin enforcement of the Illinois Interchange Prohibition Act (IFPA)?

Case Summary: ABA and its co-plaintiffs (collectively ABA) moved for summary judgment, asking the court to enjoin enforcement of the IFPA permanently.

The IFPA, which is set to go into effect July 1, 2025, prohibits financial institutions from charging credit and debit card interchange fees on the portions of transactions tied to state and local taxes and tips. The law also restricts the sharing of certain data obtained in the transactions.

ABA sued Kwame Raoul in his official capacity as Illinois attorney general and moved for a preliminary injunction, arguing that the National Bank Act (NBA), Home Owners Loan Act (HOLA), and Federal Credit Union Act (FCUA) preempted the IFPA and that the IFPA conflicts with the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. On Dec. 20, 2024, Judge Kendall issued a partial preliminary injunction blocking enforcement against national banks and federal savings associations, ruling the ABA was likely to win on the merits of its NBA and HOLA preemption claims. However, the court denied relief to federal credit unions because the FCUA likely did not preempt the IFPA and Illinois-chartered institutions due to sovereign immunity. Judge Kendall later extended the injunction to out-of-state state-chartered banks but not to federal credit unions.

In its motion for summary judgment, ABA pointed to Judge Kendall’s prior ruling that the NBA and HOLA preempt the IFPA. As explained in the brief, the IFPA prevents or significantly interferes with national banks’ power to receive fees, process card transactions, receive deposits, and make loans through debit cards. Further, the IFPA’s data usage limitation interferes with banks’ ability to process data, process credit and debit card transactions, receive deposits, and issue loans. The brief also emphasized the Riegle-Neal Act preempts the IFPA for out-of-state state-chartered banks, and the dormant commerce clause protects these institutions from discriminatory laws like the IFPA.

ABA also maintained that Illinois cannot avoid federal protections for national banks and similar institutions by targeting their service providers. To preserve federal preemption, according to ABA, the IFPA cannot apply to card networks or other payment processors when they provide essential services for transactions involving national banks or other federally protected institutions. ABA emphasized that the NBA preempts IFPA’s application to services needed for national banks to carry out their federally authorized activities, even if third parties perform those services. ABA also stressed that equitable principles require a broad injunction to protect these institutions from IFPA’s restrictions fully.

Finally, ABA argued the EFTA preempts the IFPA’s regulation of debit card interchange fees. Regulation II limits debit card interchange fees to the sum of a fixed rate of “21 cents” and an ad valorem component of 0.05% “multiplied by the value of the transaction.” By setting a different standard, the IFPA disrupts this uniformity and conflicts with both Regulation II and the Durbin Amendment itself.

At bottom, ABA argued an injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm. It explained that IFPA-related revenue losses cannot be recovered due to sovereign immunity and the lack of a claim against anyone but the state. ABA also warned that enforcing the data usage limitation would harm its members, who cannot stop IFPA-covered transaction data from being used in key functions like fraud prevention, rewards programs, and credit decisions. Banks may need to build costly new systems to block such data use without an injunction. ABA added that the balance of equities and public interest favor permanent relief.

Bottom Line: The Illinois AG’s response is due April 23, 2025.

Documents: Motion

Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Kentucky federal court enjoins CFPB from enforcing current 1033 final rule

Kentucky federal court enjoins CFPB from enforcing current 1033 final rule

Uncategorized
November 3, 2025

Judge Danny Reeves of the Eastern District of Kentucky issued a preliminary injunction preventing CFPB from enforcing its 1033 final rule

Post-Cantero, Ninth Circuit rules NBA does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow law

Post-Cantero, Ninth Circuit rules NBA does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow law

Uncategorized
November 3, 2025

In a 2-1 decision, a Ninth Circuit panel concluded the NBA does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow statute, relying on its prior decision in Lusnak v. Bank of America.

U.S. Supreme Court curbs universal injunctions

U.S. Supreme Court declines to review Fourth Circuit ruling limiting beneficiary bank liability for fraudulent transfers

Uncategorized
November 3, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a Fourth Circuit decision that ruled a credit union was not liable for a wire transfer in a business email compromise scam case where the credit union lacked “actual knowledge” of...

ABA, trade groups: CFPB has no authority to enact rule limiting arbitration 

U.S. Supreme Court declines to clarify FAA preemption of California’s McGill rule in Coinbase arbitration case

Uncategorized
November 3, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to examine Coinbase’s appeal seeking to clarify whether the FAA preempts the McGill rule, which allowed users to evade arbitration by pleading a request for “public injunctive relief.”

U.S. Supreme Court declines to review Second Circuit ruling on foreign sovereign immunity

U.S. Supreme Court declines to review Second Circuit ruling on foreign sovereign immunity

Uncategorized
November 3, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a Second Circuit decision that held that Halkbank was not entitled to common-law foreign sovereign immunity from criminal prosecution.

OCC issues statement for banks on recent data breach

Utah federal court declines to dismiss data breach class action against Academy Mortgage Company

Uncategorized
November 3, 2025

Judge David Barlow of the U.S. District Court of Utah refused to dismiss a data breach class action against Academy Mortgage Company.

NEWSBYTES

Former Trump adviser warns against credit card interest rate cap

November 7, 2025

Fed’s Miran: Stablecoins pose little risk to bank deposits

November 7, 2025

Fed: Policy uncertainty, AI sentiment pose financial stability risks

November 7, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

November 1, 2025
5 FedNow®  Service Developments You May Have Missed

5 FedNow® Service Developments You May Have Missed

October 31, 2025

Cash, Security, and Resilience in a Digital-First Economy

October 20, 2025
Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

October 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: The Erie Canal at 200

November 6, 2025

Podcast: Why branches are top priority for PNC

October 23, 2025

Podcast: From tractors to drones, how farming tech affects ag lending

October 16, 2025

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.