ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Compliance and Risk

My Bank Received a Subpoena For Customer Records—How Do I Respond?

July 11, 2019
Reading Time: 5 mins read

QMy bank received a civil subpoena for records pertaining to one of our customers. The subpoena asked if the bank had filed “any” reports with government agencies pursuant to this customer’s activities. The subpoena did not ask specifically if we filed a suspicious activity report, so it seems that citing the SAR non-disclosure provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act hints that we did indeed file. How should we respond? 

ACiting the specific non-disclosure provisions of the law implies there is a SAR. It’s not settled law, but the consensus seems to be that such a citation is best avoided. The response should be that your bank is complying, to the best of its ability. The bank needs to consult an attorney familiar with these types of subpoenas, as each court has its own protocols. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QUsing FICO scores as part of the selection criteria, the bank sent prescreened offers of credit to those with higher FICO scores. The offer stated an annual percentage rate. If a recipient applied for the loan, the bank—in some cases—honored the APR stated in the offer even if the applicant’s FICO score had dropped since the prescreening. However, if the FICO score had dropped significantly, the bank issued a denial. The bank did not provide risk–based pricing notices to these customers, since the ultimate credit score did not affect the pricing. The bank’s auditor is now questioning whether the bank complied with Regulation V’s requirements to provide risk-based pricing notices. Was this process compliant?  

AYes. Regulation V’s §1022.72(a) provides that (unless an exception applies) risk-based price notices are required if the creditor uses a consumer report (including a FICO score) in connection with an application of consumer credit and, based in whole or in part on that report, grants credit to the applicant on material terms that are materially less favorable than the most favorable material terms available to a substantial proportion of consumer from that creditor. The key words here are “grants credit.” In this case, the bank denied the credit based on the score. Indeed, the bank did not use any form of risk-based pricing. It applied a single APR to all of those who received credit. (Response provided March 2019)  

 

QThe 2018 amendments to the TILA–RESPA integrated disclosure rule allow revisions to the Closing Disclosure for valid changed circumstances. The bank is considering issuing the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate. The bank is aware that other lenders issue Closing Disclosures almost immediately after loan approval and issuance of the Loan Estimate which means, in most cases, the fees on the Closing Disclosure are based upon the best information available standard and most likely do not reflect the actual terms of the transaction. 

Is it acceptable to issue the initial Closing Disclosure shortly after issuing the Loan Estimate based on the best information available at that time and still be compliant?  

 ANo. It is clear in Regulation Z §1026.19(f)(1) that “the actual terms of the transaction” must be disclosed on the closing disclosure. In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has emphasized the importance of accuracy on the Closing Disclosure. For example: “The Bureau will continue to monitor the market for practices that do not comply with the rule’s Closing Disclosure accuracy standard” (emphasis added). 

The bureau agrees with commenters who stated that the practice of providing very early Closing Disclosures with terms that are nearly certain to be revised would be contrary to the underlying purpose of the closing disclosure (emphasis added). (Response provided March 2019)  

Answers are provided by Leslie Callaway, CRCM, CAFP, director of compliance outreach and development; Mark Kruhm, CRCM, CAFP, senior compliance analyst; and Rhonda Castaneda, CRCM, senior compliance analyst, ABA Regulatory Compliance and Policy. Answers do not provide, nor are they intended to substitute for, professional legal advice. Answers were current as of the response date shown at the end of each item.   

Tags: Credit scoringSuspicious Activity ReportsTILA-RESPA integrated disclosures
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Report: Biden administration to ease federal marijuana restrictions

Trump directs agencies to ease federal marijuana restrictions

Compliance and Risk
December 18, 2025

President Trump ordered federal agencies to quickly implement an existing proposal to reclassify marijuana to expand the availability of cannabis for medicinal purposes.

CFPB issues decision on TILA preemption of state laws

OCC, FDIC issue clarification on lending to bank insiders

Commercial Lending
December 18, 2025

The OCC and FDIC said they will not take action against banks for extensions of credit to complex-controlled portfolio companies that otherwise would violate the Federal Reserve’s restrictions on lending to bank insiders, provided banks satisfy certain conditions.

FOMC minutes: Persistent inflation clouds path forward

Fed publishes staff manual for supervision of large banks

Compliance and Risk
December 18, 2025

As part of a new push to increase transparency, the Federal Reserve made public the first of several staff manuals on the supervision of the largest banks.

ABA, 52 state bankers associations urge Congress to close stablecoin interest loophole

ABA, 52 state bankers associations urge Congress to close stablecoin interest loophole

Compliance and Risk
December 18, 2025

ABA joined 52 state bankers associations in sending a joint letter to Congress urging lawmakers to clarify and enforce the statutory prohibition on payment stablecoin issuers and affiliated platforms offering yield, rewards or interest to stablecoin holders because...

NIST releases draft guidelines for AI cybersecurity

NIST releases draft guidelines for AI cybersecurity

Compliance and Risk
December 18, 2025

The National Institute of Standards and Technology released draft guidelines for applying the agency’s cybersecurity framework to the adoption of artificial intelligence technologies by businesses and other organizations.

ABA points to role of regulators in discouraging bank engagement in digital assets

Fed rescinds guidelines for weighing crypto requests from non-FDIC insured banks

Compliance and Risk
December 17, 2025

The Federal Reserve rescinded a 2023 statement on how it would evaluate requests from non-FDIC insured banks to engage in cryptocurrencies and replaced it with a new statement to potentially lower the barrier for those institutions to get...

NEWSBYTES

Senate confirms Hill as FDIC chairman

December 18, 2025

Trump directs agencies to ease federal marijuana restrictions

December 18, 2025

Mortgage rates drop slightly

December 18, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

November 1, 2025
5 FedNow®  Service Developments You May Have Missed

5 FedNow® Service Developments You May Have Missed

October 31, 2025

Cash, Security, and Resilience in a Digital-First Economy

October 20, 2025
Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

October 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Cybersecurity in a mobile-first banking landscape

December 18, 2025

Podcast: The 2026 outlook for bank M&A

December 11, 2025

Podcast: The outlook for tech-forward community banking

December 4, 2025

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.