ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Texas federal court partially enjoins DOL’s overtime final rule

July 1, 2024
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Business groups seek stay of Labor Department overtime rule’s effective date 

Overtime Final Rule
Texas v. Department of Labor
Date: June 28, 2024

Issue: Whether the Department of Labor’s (DOL) overtime final rule exceeds its authority under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Case Summary: A Texas federal court issued a preliminary injunction partially blocking the DOL’s overtime final rule.

The rule increased the salary level below which an employee is automatically subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime and minimum wage requirements.  As of July 1, the existing $35,568 salary level increased to $43,888.  Therefore, if a bank has exempt employees who make between $35,568 and $43,888, the bank will need to reclassify the employee as nonexempt—and thus subject to federal overtime and minimum wage requirements—or increase the employee’s salary to $43,888.

The state of Texas sued DOL challenging the rule, and the court blocked enforcement against the state of Texas (as an employer) only.  Relatedly, a group of nonfinancial trade associations filed a separate lawsuit challenging the rule.  The court did not rule on that lawsuit, which had not sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin the July 1 salary increase. Consequently, unless there is further judicial action, the 2024 rule takes effect on July 1 with respect to all private employers, including banks.

In its ruling, the court concluded Texas’s challenge met the requirements for issuance of a preliminary injunction, in that the rule is “likely unlawful and Texas is likely to succeed on the merits” of its challenge.  The court concluded the proper inquiry into whether someone works in an executive, administrative, or professional capacity—the three exemptions at issue—“must turn on that person’s function and duties.”  The mention of salary in the statutory text describing the exemptions is “glaringly absent.”  Therefore, any rule defining the scope of the exemptions must “center on duties” of employees, but the rule would change the status of millions of employees without considering the employees’ duties.  The court held that DOL’s changes to the minimum salary level are “likely in excess” of the department’s statutory jurisdiction.

Bottom Line: A decision on the trade associations’ lawsuit is expected before the next salary level increase, which would occur on Jan. 1, 2025.  At that time, if the rule is not enjoined, the salary level would increase to $58,656 under the rule.

Document: Preliminary injunction

Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA files coalition amicus brief arguing FDIC’s CMP against CBW Bank violates Jarkesy

Seventh Circuit upholds FDIC’s in-house enforcement process

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Seventh Circuit panel ruled that the FDIC did not violate the Seventh Amendment by adjudicating an enforcement action seeking a prohibition order and civil money penalty.

Fifth Circuit rules SEC must fix stock buyback rule

Tenth Circuit affirms dismissal of APA challenge to SEC enforcement action

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

A unanimous Tenth Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the SEC’s enforcement of federal anti-money laundering reporting requirements against an affiliate.

FDIC posts sample docs to provide clarity into marketing, sale process of failing banks

Second Circuit rules AP7 has prudential standing to pursue Signature Bank securities claims

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Second Circuit panel vacated a New York federal court decision ruling that Sjunde AP-Fonden (AP7) lacked prudential standing to pursue securities fraud claims against KPMG and former Signature Bank officers.

OCC releases Q3 bank trading revenue report

Nine states sue OCC over escrow powers and preemption rules

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

Nine states sued the OCC, alleging it exceeded its authority and violated the APA by issuing its Escrow Powers and Preemption Rules.

Eastern District of Michigan dismisses $2 million wire fraud suit against Fifth Third Bank

Eastern District of Michigan dismisses $2 million wire fraud suit against Fifth Third Bank

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

The court refused to hold Fifth Third Bank liable for the wire fraud because Hegira could not identify any agreed-upon security procedure that the bank handled in a commercially unreasonable manner or failed to follow in good faith.

CFPB issues interim final rule for Libor transition

Ninth Circuit rules fixed dividend rate can serve as LIBOR Act benchmark replacement

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded, ruling that the LIBOR Act does not require a floating replacement rate and permits a contract’s fixed-rate fallback to serve as a valid benchmark replacement when LIBOR is unavailable.

NEWSBYTES

FCC proposes ‘robocall scorecard’ to rate voice service providers

September 5, 2026

IRS to issue final rule on auto loan deduction

September 4, 2026

Consumers share experiences with AI-enabled scams

September 4, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

September 1, 2026
Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

September 1, 2026
Could Your Bank Absorb the Hidden Cost of Running Legacy Systems?

Could Your Bank Absorb the Hidden Cost of Running Legacy Systems?

August 20, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

The exam question a backup can’t answer

August 18, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

Podcast: Tactics for meaningful strategic planning

July 28, 2026

Podcast: Why it might be time to revisit a key FDIC ratio

July 23, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.