ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Tax and Accounting

Executive, Board Transitions Require Careful Liquidity Planning

July 8, 2019
Reading Time: 7 mins read
Executive, Board Transitions Require Careful Liquidity Planning

By John Erwin  

The landscape of financial services has shifted radically over the previous 20 years. Not only do millennials and Generation Z make up an increasingly large portion of the workforce, bringing with them their own unique preferences and traits, technology has fundamentally changed how consumers look to engage with their financial institution.  

At the same time however, bank management and boards of directors have remained largely static, with the average age of a bank executive around 55 years old. This has benefited the industry with a wealth of institutional knowledge and experience that many banks would struggle without. While these boards and executives try to recruit fresh, talented members to bolster their own knowledge, there is a growing concern of “what’s next?”  

Strategies for director and executive transitions  

These accomplished directors and executives serve in many critical roles, but the frank truth is no one wants to work forever. Instead, they are planning their retirement and how to spend their golden years reaping the benefits of their dedicated work. Likewise, many of these individuals have a vested stake in the success of their bank, whether in the form of stock options or outright ownership. As a result, many of them are carefully evaluating and balancing their options when it comes to making their exit.  

Smaller financial institutions, however, typically have illiquid stock that can be difficult to valuate and sell. This can present challenges when directors and executives want to cash in on their ownership, but there is no clear market or price point for them to make their exit at. In such scenarios, executives and directors will want to take a calculated approach to making their exit in order to maximize value for all owners.  

The desired approach largely depends on the bank’s ownership structure and who the shareholders are. For instance, if there are only one or two shareholders looking to cash out, they will generally need to find other potential investors looking to buy in, or they’ll need to conduct a stock buyback. Thanks in part to the 2017 tax reform law, these buybacks have grown in popularity as companies use their additional after–tax earnings to create liquidity for shareholders.  

Another option in this situation could be the establishment of an employee stock ownership plan, which is an employee-owner program that provides a company’s workforce with ownership interest in the company. Shareholders looking to exit could then sell their shares to the ESOP to liquidate their investment, and in turn, provide a qualified retirement benefit for employees and invest them in the bank’s continued success.  

On the flip side, if the entire management or ownership group is ready to exit, they will generally seek out a cash or equity sell. A cash sell creates a taxable event for shareholders and essentially ends their investment at that point. The primary concern for shareholders in these situations is the price being paid and whether they are satisfied with it.  

Most deals however, involve some form of equity where the acquiring bank agrees to buy the shareholders’ institution with a mix of cash and equity. This can create a substantial amount of liquidity for the selling bank’s shareholders if it has very illiquid stock and the acquirer’s stock is much more liquid, such as being an actively traded public company.  

For deals that are funded largely through equity, an important element to keep in mind is proper due diligence conducted in both directions. With a cash deal, the seller is typically less interested in the acquiring bank’s long-term plan, but rather on the price they are being paid. After all, they are making their exit. Equity deals, in contrast, involve exchanging their ownership for a stake in another institution. This creates a marriage of sorts where the seller’s return depends significantly on the success of the acquiring institution.  

In such situations, it’s not only important for the selling institution to conduct proper financial due diligence to ensure the purchasing institution is healthy, but to also confirm that the buyer and seller both understand each other’s expectations for how the combined bank will operate. This means developing a clearly defined vision for future success, especially in an industry that is being fundamentally changed by the introduction of new technologies and market players. Sellers in particular will want to verify that buyers are technologically savvy and willing to adjust their approach to meet changing consumer needs.  

For shareholders looking to retain or continue their investment, but perhaps distance themselves from day-to-day operations, succession planning becomes the main priority. When bankers use a leveraged ESOP or share buy-back, their time horizon for a return is significantly longer. In these situations, shareholders will want to ensure they are training their team, but also looking for out for opportunities and talent outside their institution.  

The key question shareholders should ask themselves is: “Do I have the proper executive team to fit within my long-term plans, or will I need to go outside the company?” The answer to this question will typically define a banker’s next steps in terms of either recruiting new executive staff or seeking support outside their new organization. Either way, shareholders will want to ensure whoever is left in charge is excited and ready for the bank’s future growth.  

Generous lead times provide flexibility 

Typically, this will require some incentive to ensure executives stick around and are invested in the bank’s long-term success. Current shareholders will need to have some in-depth conversations on this point, as it could mean transferring some of their current ownership to the next team or potentially creating a stock or equity plan. This way, when the executives consider their own personal and professional success, they will include the bank’s as well.  

For many of the decisions discussed in here, even a year or two out is a short time horizon to be planning for such efforts. The sooner and more clearly defined a bank’s succession plan is developed, the easier and smoother the transition will be for customers, employees and shareholders alike.  

John Erwin is senior audit manager at PKM, an Atlanta-based accounting and advisory firm serving public and private organizations in the financial services, insurance and technology industries. 

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: DirectorsLiquidity
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Budget bill narrowly passes Senate, moves back to House

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

ABA Banking Journal Podcast
July 10, 2025

Following the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, hear from ABA experts on how key ABA-supported provisions on tax policy, rural real estate and health savings accounts in the budget reconciliation law will affect banks.

ABA, associations urge lawmakers to finalize deal on debt ceiling

Updated: President signs ‘big beautiful bill’ including numerous ABA-backed provisions

Ag Banking
July 3, 2025

Included in the bill were several ABA-supported tax provisions related to banks, including a modified version of the ABA-advocated ACRE Act and the permanent extension of the Section 199A pass-through deduction rate of 20%.

ABA offers feedback to FASB request for input on its agenda development 

ABA offers feedback to FASB request for input on its agenda development 

Newsbytes
July 1, 2025

The association’s feedback identifies opportunities to more closely align underlying economics with accounting outcomes; opportunities to balance costs relative to benefits; and topic areas for which ABA does not believe a project should be added.

House-Passed Defense Bill Includes SAFE Banking Act

ABA, state associations support tax provisions in budget bill

Newsbytes
June 29, 2025

Provisions welcomed by ABA and the state associations include a narrow version of the ACRE Act and a permanent Section 199A deduction that levels the playing field for Subchapter S banks.

First-party data: Smarter insights when determining creditworthiness

Volatility prompts banks to hoard cash and implement financial hedges

Compliance and Risk
June 24, 2025

Even smaller banks with only a few billion dollars in assets are using swaps and other derivatives to more proactively hedge risk.

ABA comments on proposal to improve accounting in tax credit structures

Senate tax measure contains provisions on ACRE, pass-through business deduction

Ag Banking
June 17, 2025

The Senate Finance Committee released its reconciliation tax text that contains several differences from the version passed by the House, including changes to provisions related to the ACRE Act and the Section 199A passthrough business deduction.

NEWSBYTES

House passes bills on stablecoins, digital assets, CBDCs

July 17, 2025

Business inventories hold steady in May

July 17, 2025

Mortgage rates rise

July 17, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

The future of careers in risk and compliance

July 17, 2025

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.