ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Legal

Of Chickens, Debt Collection and Standing

October 1, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read

By Dawn Causey, Andrew Doersam and Thomas Pinder

For those following the Supreme Court, the upcoming fall term is “egg-celent.” Not only is the Supreme Court hearing three cases about chickens and the Commerce Clause, there are several banking cases the American Bankers Association is watching, including Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP.

Obduskey will address whether the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies to nonjudicial mortgage foreclosures. In 2009, a Colorado homeowner defaulted on his Wells Fargo mortgage. Wells initiated nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings and spent six years attempting to foreclose on the property. During the foreclosure process, the homeowner cried “fowl,” alleging that Wells Fargo violated the FDCPA’s debt validations procedures and sued Wells Fargo in Colorado federal district court. Both the district court and the Tenth Circuit held the FDCPA does not apply to nonjudicial foreclosures. However, the Tenth Circuit’s holding conflicts with the Third, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits, as well as the state supreme courts of Alaska and Colorado. Given the changing composition of the Supreme Court—including a new justice—it is difficult to gauge how it will come down on this issue.

In Lorenzo v. SEC, the Supreme Court will review whether an individual is liable for a fraudulent scheme when emailing misleading statements made by someone else. The dispute arose from emails sent by Francis Lorenzo, the former director of investment banking at Charles Vista, LLC, to two potential investors, which included “several key points” about then-client W2Energy Holdings’ convertible debenture offering. The emails failed to mention recent material devaluation of W2Energy’s intangible assets.
The SEC charged Lorenzo, as well as his boss and Charles Vista, with fraud in violation of the Securities Act Section 17(a)(1), Exchange Act Section 10(b), and Rule 10b-5. The firm and the boss settled; Lorenzo fought the charges, but the SEC administrative law judge ultimately found that he acted willfully with the intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud. On appeal, the D.C. Circuit concluded that Lorenzo did not actually “make” the statement and therefore was not liable under Rule 10b-5(b).

However, the D.C. Circuit determined that Lorenzo was liable for perpetuating the fraudulent scheme because he knowingly sent the false statements in the email. Judge Brett Kavanaugh issued a blistering dissent. He criticized the administrative law proceeding and the SEC’s decision to uphold its liability findings. He also stated the majority opinion’s deference to the SEC was unwarranted in these circumstances.

Moving on, Apple v. Pepper focuses on antitrust and standing. The dispute is over whether Apple, by charging app developers a 30 percent commission fee and only allowing iOS apps to be sold through its own store, has inflated the price of iPhone apps. Plaintiffs, a class of consumers, alleged that Apple’s closed-app system has monopolized the aftermarket for iPhone software apps.

Apple argues that the plaintiffs do not have the right to sue under current U.S. antitrust laws. At the core of the lawsuit is another Supreme Court case from 1977, Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, which established that a consumer cannot sue for antitrust damages if the consumer is not the direct purchaser of a good or service. According to Apple, iPhone consumers are direct purchasers only in the sense that they deal directly with Apple in purchasing apps from the App Store, but they are not direct purchasers of Apple’s app distribution services.

Now to the chickens. For years, people have been pondering “why did the chicken cross the road?” But this fall, the question becomes: What happens when the chicken cannot cross state lines? Is that a violation of the commerce clause? In three separate cases, a group of states, suppliers and restaurants are challenging California and Massachusetts laws that block the sale of poultry if the animals were confined or fed in a cruel manner. (The two states demand that their chickens have free range and are treated humanely before they are slaughtered and sold for consumption.) The challengers are ultimately asking the Supreme Court address whether lawmakers in any one state may dictate how farmers in other states raise livestock.

From chickens to debt collection, the Supreme Court certainly has a full plate this upcoming term.

Dawn Causey is general counsel at ABA, where Thomas Pinder is SVP for litigation and Andrew Doersam is a paralegal.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Debt collectionForeclosuresSecurities activities
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

CFPB warns against collection of ‘legally invalid’ medical debt

Court vacates CFPB medical debt rule

Compliance and Risk
July 14, 2025

A federal court in Texas vacated the CFPB’s medical debt reporting rule after the bureau’s current leadership joined with plaintiffs in asking it to be struck down.

CFPB launches ‘tip line’ to report on bureau employees

ABA, associations urge CFPB to rescind changes to adjudication process

Legal
June 13, 2025

ABA joined three associations in voicing support for a CFPB proposal to rescind a set of changes to the bureau’s rules that, among other things, gave its director authority to resolve adjudication hearings overseen by the agency.

Acting OCC head discusses regulatory tailoring, bank merger reviews

OCC’s Hood affirms support for federal preemption

Legal
June 9, 2025

Acting Comptroller of the Currency Rodney Hood strongly affirmed the OCC’s continued support for federal preemption of state laws for national banks and federal thrifts, defending preemption as both lawful and pro-competitive.

SEC updates data breach standards for investment companies, advisers

CFPB asks court to vacate Section 1033 data sharing rule

Compliance and Risk
June 2, 2025

The CFPB has asked a federal court to vacate its rule on financial data sharing, citing the rule’s “numerous legal infirmities.”

Illinois lawmakers vote to delay implementation date for state interchange fee law

Illinois lawmakers vote to delay implementation date for state interchange fee law

Legal
June 1, 2025

The Illinois General Assembly approved legislation extending by a year the effective date of a first-of-its-kind state law restricting interchange fees.

Helping Home Buyers Navigate a Hot Housing Market

Reconsideration of value: A critical component of appraisal review

Compliance and Risk
May 28, 2025

Ensuring appraisals and other types of property valuations are accurate is not just about fair lending.

NEWSBYTES

ABA offers fixes for small-business lending data collection rule

July 18, 2025

ABA DataBank: Retail sales rebounded in June

July 18, 2025

CFPB to keep notification procedures for state enforcement of consumer law

July 18, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

The future of careers in risk and compliance

July 17, 2025

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.