ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

EagleBank agrees to pay $9.7 million to resolve DOJ Bank Secrecy Act allegations

August 5, 2026
Reading Time: 2 mins read
EagleBank agrees to pay $9.7 million to resolve DOJ Bank Secrecy Act allegations

Bank Secrecy Act
In re: Eagle Bank
Date: June 30, 2026

Issue: EagleBank’s non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to resolve allegations that it violated the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) by willfully failing to implement an anti-money laundering (AML) program and permitting a fraudulent check scheme.

Case Summary: EagleBank agreed to pay more than $9.7 million under a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ to resolve an investigation into alleged BSA violations.

The DOJ alleged that from approximately 2010 through 2021, EagleBank failed to maintain an effective AML program as required by the Bank Secrecy Act. According to the DOJ, EagleBank knowingly allowed certain favored clients to operate a check kiting scheme, a form of fraud that takes advantage of the delay in check processing, due in part to the then-CEO and chairman and the then-chief credit officer “repeatedly over[riding] the efforts of compliance personnel to close the accounts and end the illicit conduct.” EagleBank compliance staff reported the fraud concerns to the government through suspicious activity reports (SARs) within days of the account in question being opened in 2010.

In addition, the DOJ alleged that EagleBank failed to establish effective internal controls for high-risk customers and did not adopt clear procedures for deciding when to close accounts linked to repeated suspicious activity. Although employees repeatedly recommended closing the customers’ accounts and filed multiple SARs over more than a decade, EagleBank allegedly kept the accounts open because of the customers’ lending relationship.

Under the non-prosecution agreement, EagleBank agreed to pay approximately $9.7 million to resolve the allegations and strengthen its AML program by reviewing and enhancing its internal controls, policies, and procedures to ensure compliance with the BSA and other applicable AML laws. EagleBank must also implement any extra measures needed to detect and deter future violations and certify to the DOJ that it has fulfilled its compliance obligations.

Bottom Line: EagleBank said that it is committed to fully complying with all obligations of the agreement.

Document: Agreement

Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA, trade groups: CFPB has no authority to enact rule limiting arbitration 

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to clarify Federal Arbitration Act’s application to bankruptcy claims

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

ABA filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit decision holding that the FAA does not require courts to enforce arbitration agreements covering claims under Section 362(k) of the Bankruptcy Code.

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. District Court of Oregon to enjoin Oregon’s rate opt-out law

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. District Court of Oregon to enjoin Oregon’s rate opt-out law

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the U.S. District Court of Oregon to grant a preliminary injunction to prevent Oregon from enforcing its “rate opt-out law.”

Post-Cantero, Ninth Circuit rules NBA does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow law

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to settle circuit split on NBA preemption for interest on escrow laws

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision holding that the National Bank Act does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow law.

Southern District of New York dismisses Block customer data breach class action

Block Inc. agrees to pay $45 million to resolve Cash App fraud allegations

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

Block Inc. will pay $45 million to 46 states to resolve allegations that it misled Cash App users about the app's security and failed to protect them from fraud.

U.S. District Court of Maryland dismisses usury lawsuit against Capital One

U.S. District Court of Maryland dismisses usury lawsuit against Capital One

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

A Maryland federal court dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Cap One charged credit card account holders excessive interest.

U.S. Court of Federal Claims applies Loper Bright to strike down treasury GILTI regulation

U.S. Court of Federal Claims applies Loper Bright to strike down treasury GILTI regulation

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

In one of the first major applications of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled the U.S. Department of the Treasury lacked the statutory authority to promulgate Treasury Regulation Section 1.951A-2(c)(5).

NEWSBYTES

Report: Health savings accounts covered 62M Americans in 2025

August 5, 2026

ADP: 44,000 jobs added in July

August 5, 2026

ABA DataBank: ISM Services Index inched up in July

August 5, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Relationship Banking at Scale: Why Banks Need The Digital Sales & Service Platform

Relationship Banking at Scale: Why Banks Need The Digital Sales & Service Platform

August 1, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

Examiners Are Now Looking at Your Non-Core Systems

June 11, 2026
Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

June 1, 2026
A Modern Blueprint for Serving High-Net-Worth Families

A Modern Blueprint for Serving High-Net-Worth Families

May 28, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

Podcast: Tactics for meaningful strategic planning

July 28, 2026

Podcast: Why it might be time to revisit a key FDIC ratio

July 23, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.