ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: June 2026

Is it still "free checking" if paper statements cost money?

June 8, 2026
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Compliance question of the month: February 2025

My bank offers a consumer checking account product titled “Free Checking.” This product currently has no maintenance or activity fees, and no minimum balance or transaction requirements. The bank is considering adding a nominal monthly paper statement fee to this product for customers who do not enroll in paperless e-statements.

Q Under Regulation DD (Truth in Savings Act), could the bank continue to title the product “Free Checking” and advertise the product as “free” if it implements a paper statement fee, or would this fee be considered a “maintenance or activity fee”?

A It is not 100% clear.

If the bank were to introduce this paper-statement fee, there is risk it could be considered a “maintenance or activity fee,” and the bank would not be permitted to continue to advertise the product as “free” under Regulation DD.

Regulation DD, 12 CFR § 1030.8(a)(2), prohibits describing an account as “free” (or using a similar term) “if any maintenance or activity fee may be imposed on the account.”  Comment 3 to § 1030.8(a) explains that maintenance or activity fees include, among other things:

  1. “transaction and service fees that consumers reasonably expect to be imposed on a regular basis,” and
  2. “a flat fee, such as a monthly service fee.”

Here, a monthly paper-statement fee could be a service fee that “consumers reasonably expect to be imposed on a regular basis.” In addition, a monthly paper-statement fee may be considered a “flat fee, such as a monthly service fee,” even if consumers could avoid it by choosing to enroll in e-statements. The “free” nature of the product would be conditioned on the consumer taking affirmative action, and advertising the product as “free” without further qualification could be misleading.

On the other hand, Regulation DD does not expressly address the treatment of avoidable paper-statement fees, and because consumers could avoid this fee, there may be an argument that it is more analogous to the types of optional fees that may be charged on “free” accounts, such as fees for safe deposit boxes or cashier’s checks.

To mitigate risk, the bank could revise the product name and advertising to clearly reflect the condition (e.g., “Free Checking with E‑Statements”). This approach would improve accuracy and avoid misleading impressions.

For more information, contact ABA’s Leslie Callaway.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

Tags: Checking accountsCompliance
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA files amicus brief urging N.Y. Supreme Court to dismiss Zelle lawsuit against Early Warning Services LLC

ABA files amicus brief urging N.Y. Supreme Court to dismiss Zelle lawsuit against Early Warning Services LLC

Uncategorized
July 6, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the Supreme Court of New York to dismiss a lawsuit against EWS for allegedly failing to protect Zelle users from fraud.

ABA files amicus brief urging second circuit to reverse secondary liability ruling

ABA files amicus brief urging second circuit to reverse secondary liability ruling

Uncategorized
July 6, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the Second Circuit to reverse a New York federal court decision that held BNP Paribas secondarily liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act for injuries arising from violent acts committed by the Sudanese...

Supreme Court upholds government authority to dismiss False Claims Act cases

ABA files amicus urging full Tenth Circuit to hold Colorado’s rate opt-out law violates DIDMCA

Uncategorized
July 6, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the full Tenth Circuit to reverse a three-judge panel's decision, which ruled that a loan is "made in" an opt-out state when either the lender or the borrower is located there.

Santander Consumer USA Inc. agrees to pay $675K to resolve extension fee allegations

Santander Consumer USA Inc. agrees to pay $675K to resolve extension fee allegations

Uncategorized
July 6, 2026

Santander Consumer USA Inc. agreed to pay $675,000 to settle allegations that it violated New York Banking Law § 350 by charging auto loan borrowers undisclosed $25 extension fees.

BarterPay sues Deutsche Bank and Pathward over MATCH list placement and transaction laundering allegations

Sixth Circuit affirms dismissal of investor fraud lawsuit against PNC Bank

Uncategorized
July 6, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Sixth Circuit panel affirmed dismissal of a lawsuit alleging PNC Bank facilitated an investment advisor's multimillion-dollar fraud by processing allegedly suspicious banking transactions.

Third Circuit reverses FCRA lawsuit against Nissan over lease dispute

U.S. Supreme Court declines review of FCRA credit report access decision

Uncategorized
July 6, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a Third Circuit decision that ruled the FCRA permits a lender to obtain a consumer's credit report when the consumer neither initiated nor authorized the underlying credit transaction.

NEWSBYTES

ROAD to Housing Act becomes law

July 11, 2026

ABA DataBank: Rates and oil diverge

July 10, 2026

Regulators close Indiana’s Kentland Federal Savings and Loan

July 10, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

Examiners Are Now Looking at Your Non-Core Systems

June 11, 2026
Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

June 1, 2026
A Modern Blueprint for Serving High-Net-Worth Families

A Modern Blueprint for Serving High-Net-Worth Families

May 28, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

AI Is in Your Bank. Is Your Cloud Contract Governing It?

May 20, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Understanding the 2025 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data

July 8, 2026

Podcast: Financing America’s independence

June 29, 2026

Podcast: Talent and innovation in community banking

June 18, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.