ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: August 2026

Can a loan replacing a construction loan be reportable under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA)?

August 17, 2026
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Compliance question of the month: February 2025

Q Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), how does a bank report the separate permanent financing that replaces a construction-only loan when it did not make the original construction loan? Specifically, should the bank report this loan as a home purchase or a refinance, and what application and action taken dates should it report?

A The separate permanent financing that replaces a construction-only loan is reported as a “home purchase loan,” even if the financial institution making the permanent loan did not originate the construction loan. Comment -3 to 12 CFR § 1003.2(j) explains that “[a] home purchase loan includes both a combined construction/permanent loan or line of credit, and the separate permanent financing that replaces a construction-only loan or line of credit for the same borrower at a later time.” This requirement applies regardless of whether the institution originating the separate permanent financing also originated the construction-only loan. In this situation, the loan is a home purchase loan, and must be reported as such, notwithstanding the fact that the permanent financing satisfies and replaces an existing dwelling-secured debt obligation and therefore may also be considered a refinancing. If, however, the permanent financing was replacing something other than a construction-only loan and comment -3 to § 1003.2(j) did not apply, the loan would be reported as a refinancing if the criteria in § 1003.2(p) were satisfied.

Further, for reporting purposes, the application date and action taken date associated with the separate permanent financing are determined under the standard requirements applicable to home purchase loans, regardless of who originated the construction-only loan. The application date, for example, is the date the borrower applies for the permanent financing that will replace the construction-only loan. § 1003.4(a)(1)(ii). Similarly, the action taken date is determined based on the date the institution takes action on the application for permanent financing and is not affected by the origination date of the prior construction-only loan. § 1003.4(a)(8)(ii); see comment 4(a)(8)(ii)-5.

For more information, contact ABA’s Terri Hollinger.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

Tags: ComplianceHMDA
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA files coalition amicus brief arguing FDIC’s CMP against CBW Bank violates Jarkesy

Seventh Circuit upholds FDIC’s in-house enforcement process

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Seventh Circuit panel ruled that the FDIC did not violate the Seventh Amendment by adjudicating an enforcement action seeking a prohibition order and civil money penalty.

Fifth Circuit rules SEC must fix stock buyback rule

Tenth Circuit affirms dismissal of APA challenge to SEC enforcement action

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

A unanimous Tenth Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the SEC’s enforcement of federal anti-money laundering reporting requirements against an affiliate.

FDIC posts sample docs to provide clarity into marketing, sale process of failing banks

Second Circuit rules AP7 has prudential standing to pursue Signature Bank securities claims

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Second Circuit panel vacated a New York federal court decision ruling that Sjunde AP-Fonden (AP7) lacked prudential standing to pursue securities fraud claims against KPMG and former Signature Bank officers.

OCC releases Q3 bank trading revenue report

Nine states sue OCC over escrow powers and preemption rules

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

Nine states sued the OCC, alleging it exceeded its authority and violated the APA by issuing its Escrow Powers and Preemption Rules.

Eastern District of Michigan dismisses $2 million wire fraud suit against Fifth Third Bank

Eastern District of Michigan dismisses $2 million wire fraud suit against Fifth Third Bank

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

The court refused to hold Fifth Third Bank liable for the wire fraud because Hegira could not identify any agreed-upon security procedure that the bank handled in a commercially unreasonable manner or failed to follow in good faith.

CFPB issues interim final rule for Libor transition

Ninth Circuit rules fixed dividend rate can serve as LIBOR Act benchmark replacement

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded, ruling that the LIBOR Act does not require a floating replacement rate and permits a contract’s fixed-rate fallback to serve as a valid benchmark replacement when LIBOR is unavailable.

NEWSBYTES

FinCEN, banking agencies release FAQs on digital credentials, customer ID

September 8, 2026

New York Fed: Inflation expectations ticked down in August

September 8, 2026

ABA, associations urge FHA to provide clear language about eligibility for VA loan terms

September 8, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

September 1, 2026
Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

September 1, 2026
Could Your Bank Absorb the Hidden Cost of Running Legacy Systems?

Could Your Bank Absorb the Hidden Cost of Running Legacy Systems?

August 20, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

The exam question a backup can’t answer

August 18, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

Podcast: Tactics for meaningful strategic planning

July 28, 2026

Podcast: Why it might be time to revisit a key FDIC ratio

July 23, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.