ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Compliance and Risk

Are the Feds Going Too Far in Search of Scalps?

January 5, 2016
Reading Time: 3 mins read

By Dawn Causey

Should more corporate officials be going to jail? It is not as simple as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) seems to want when she said, “If you steal $100 on Main Street, you’re probably going to jail. If you steal a billion bucks on Wall Street, you darn well better go to jail, too.”

Consider the Yates Memorandum issued earlier this fall (technically the “Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing” memorandum). In a memo to the Justice Department’s prosecutors and civil litigators, Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates asserted that because corporations can commit crimes only through people, it is DOJ’s prosecutorial duty to hold individuals accountable for the actions that they cause corporations to take. This is an admirable sentiment in the abstract but often difficult to apply in real life, where missteps can have serious human consequences.

Prior to the Yates Memorandum, corporations received DOJ credit for cooperating with law enforcement by voluntarily disclosing troublesome issues and transactions at an early stage. Those entities with robust training programs and efforts at remediation received less onerous fines. The “carrot” of DOJ rewards for good corporate behavior produced earlier notifications and quicker efforts at redress, which generally resulted in deferred prosecution agreements or similar settlements.

Such cooperation will be difficult going forward. Bowing to the chorus of political pressure, the Yates Memorandum:

  • Directs prosecutors to focus on individuals at the outset of every investigation.
  • Promotes prosecution of individuals regardless of their ability to pay likely penalties.
  • Prohibits the use of settlements that provide protection from criminal or civil liability for any individual absent extraordinary circumstances.
  • Instructs prosecutors not to resolve corporate cases without a clear plan to resolve related individual cases, including a direction that any declination to prosecute individuals must be approved by the U.S. attorney or assistant attorney general in charge of the investigation. Few, if any, prosecutors will want to be the one who failed to prosecute the corporate officer who led the company astray.

More substantively, the Yates Memorandum requires corporations to turn over information about individuals involved in or “responsible for” the suspect conduct as a condition for receiving cooperation credit from DOJ. It is an all-or-nothing proposition with no partial credit given to companies that disclose some, but not all, of relevant information about individual bad actors.

What does this mean in practice—and for the community banker in particular? Fortunately, for most of the industry, the likelihood of DOJ arriving on the doorstep is rare. However, like prosecutors, financial regulators wish not to be viewed as soft on the institutions they oversee.

The SEC has been criticized for its lack of individual prosecutions. The financial regulators have long had the ability to “remove and prohibit” individuals from the industry, but only through administrative enforcement orders (the consent versions of which often neither admit nor deny wrongdoing) and these are typically pursued only after an agency’s lengthy investigation. Will the ability to consent to regulatory orders without admitting liability be an option in the future?

The biggest question about this ever-growing toolbox of enforcement vehicles: when is it enough? With the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, whistleblowers were empowered and compensated for their efforts. More recently, whistleblowers have received multimillion-dollar bounties under repurposed FIRREA sections. Now the DOJ is encouraging and directing corporations to investigate and turn in their managers. DOJ prosecutors are directed to pursue deals with lower-ranking executives to support cases against those persons’ superiors. Internal investigations, often difficult, will be more so because no one knows whom or what is targeted.

More difficult will be those situations where the corporation and the DOJ disagree on the “facts” and what they prove.

Holding individuals liable should be difficult—it is a basic premise of American jurisprudence that individuals are innocent until proven guilty. Trying to create shortcuts by transferring the investigatory obligation from the government to employers undercuts that basic right. Enough is enough.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Financial crimesFIRREAProfessional liability
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

CFPB warns against certain terms in financial service contracts

CFPB withdraws proposed ban on certain contract language for financial products

Compliance and Risk
May 15, 2025

The CFPB has withdrawn a proposed rule to prohibit contractual provisions in agreements for consumer financial products or services that waive “substantive” consumer legal rights and protections.

Survey: Bank customers say youth need financial education

Survey: Most Americans want high schools to offer financial education

Financial Education
May 15, 2025

More than four in five Americans believe that financial education should be part of high school curricula, according to a recent survey. Twenty-seven states currently require such courses.

CFPB launches ‘tip line’ to report on bureau employees

CFPB withdraws proposals on data brokers, digital payment mechanisms

Newsbytes
May 15, 2025

The CFPB has withdrawn two proposed rules concerning data brokers and digital payment mechanisms. Both were proposed after the 2024 elections.

Bankers urge lawmakers to ease regulatory hurdles for de novo bank formation

Bankers urge lawmakers to ease regulatory hurdles for de novo bank formation

Community Banking
May 14, 2025

The founders of two de novo banks shared with lawmakers the challenges of launching a new financial institution in the current regulatory climate, and they pushed for legislation to ease some of those burdens in the early years...

Banker op-ed: Durbin-Marshall credit card bill will hurt small businesses

Report: Federal, state attempts to limit credit card interchange would harm consumers

Newsbytes
May 14, 2025

Legislation intended to reduce credit card interchange fees would reduce revenue for community banks and credit unions, leading to less access to credit and disproportionately harming low-income households, according to a recently published academic report.

ABA comments on proposal to improve accounting in tax credit structures

House committee advances tax package with ABA priorities

Ag Banking
May 14, 2025

The House Ways and Means Committee voted along party lines to advance a federal budget reconciliation tax package that includes several of ABA's policy priorities

NEWSBYTES

CFPB withdraws proposed ban on certain contract language for financial products

May 15, 2025

Mortgage rates rise

May 15, 2025

Survey: Most Americans want high schools to offer financial education

May 15, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025
Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

March 15, 2025
AI for Banks: A Starter Guide for Community and Regional Institutions

AI for Banks: A Starter Guide for Community and Regional Institutions

March 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Accelerating banking for quick-service restaurants

May 8, 2025

How a Georgia community bank supports government-guaranteed lending nationwide

May 1, 2025

Podcast: Quantum computing’s shakeup in payments, cybersecurity

April 24, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.