ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Community Banking

Court Issues Mixed Decision in North Carolina Business Judgment Case

August 18, 2015
Reading Time: 2 mins read

A federal appeals court today issued a mixed decision in the closely watched case of FDIC v. Rippy, which arose from the 2009 failure of a North Carolina community bank. The FDIC sued the bank’s directors and officers, alleging that the bank failed due to their negligence, both simple and gross, and breaches of fiduciary duties. A local federal court granted summary judgment to the directors and officers, and the FDIC appealed.

At issue in the case — also known as FDIC v. Willetts — is the business judgment rule, which protects directors and officers from personal liability for decisions made in good faith and according to a rational process. ABA and the state bankers associations filed a brief supporting the Rippy defendants that emphasized the necessity of robust protections for good-faith business decisions by bank directors and officers.

The appeals court agreed with the local court that the FDIC failed to prove gross negligence on the part of directors and officers and bad faith on the part of the directors. However, the court found the FDIC did meet its burden under summary judgment and that a trial was necessary to determine whether the bank’s officers exercised bad faith in approving loans that soured.

In Rippy, the court found, the officers did not enjoy the protections of the business judgment rule because they took actions that would be harmful to the bank without adequate information. For example, the ruling cited evidence that the officers approved loans over the phone without receiving documents until later — sometimes after the loans had already been funded.

If not settled, the case will now return to the lower court for a full trial on the issue of the FDIC’s claims of ordinary negligence and breach of fiduciary duty against the bank’s officers. “I am glad to see the court reject the FDIC’s attempts to unfairly impose personal liability on bank directors for ordinary business decisions made in good faith,” said ABA President and CEO Frank Keating. For more information, contact ABA’s Tom Pinder.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Business judgment ruleDirectorsProfessional liability
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

U.S. Supreme Court settles circuit split, rules IRS may summons bank information without account holder notice

ABA asks IRS to delay new reporting requirement

Newsbytes
June 30, 2025

ABA submitted a comment letter to the IRS requesting that the agency delay by 12 months the effective date of its new "code Y" reporting requirement on Forms 1099-R and 5498 for qualified charitable distributions made by individual...

ABA supports climate disclosure exclusions, warns of alternative disclosures

ABA supports climate disclosure exclusions, warns of alternative disclosures

Newsbytes
June 30, 2025

In addition to California, for example, five states are currently debating similar laws for companies of various sizes. Among other recommendations, ABA also recommended flexibility in how commercial loan exposures and emissions are categorized by industry. 

OCC releases Q3 bank trading revenue report

OCC report: Banking system sound, key risks highlighted

Compliance and Risk
June 30, 2025

The strength of the federal banking system remains sound, the OCC reported in its most recent semiannual risk perspective report. The report covers risks facing national banks, federal savings associations, and federal branches and agencies based on data...

ABA offers support, recommendations for Treasury’s efforts to increase payment system efficiency

ABA offers support, recommendations for Treasury’s efforts to increase payment system efficiency

Newsbytes
June 30, 2025

ABA sent a letter in response to the Treasury's request for information regarding modernizing payments to and from the U.S. government, outlines recommendations to help the agency reach its deadline to transition all federal payments that are currently...

House-Passed Defense Bill Includes SAFE Banking Act

ABA, state associations support tax provisions in budget bill

Newsbytes
June 29, 2025

Provisions welcomed by ABA and the state associations include a narrow version of the ACRE Act and a permanent Section 199A deduction that levels the playing field for Subchapter S banks.

Treasury names FinCEN director

Banking agencies allow banks to collect CIP data from third parties

Compliance and Risk
June 27, 2025

The order permits banks to obtain TIN information from a third party rather than the customer as long as the bank otherwise complies with the customer identification program rule.

NEWSBYTES

ABA asks IRS to delay new reporting requirement

June 30, 2025

ABA supports climate disclosure exclusions, warns of alternative disclosures

June 30, 2025

OCC report: Banking system sound, key risks highlighted

June 30, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025
Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

March 15, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.