ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Uncategorized

Fifth Circuit vacates FTC’s CARS Rule

March 3, 2025
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Bridge It agrees to pay FTC $18 million in refunds to resolve deceptive marketing allegations

CARS Rule
National Automobile Dealers Association v. Federal Trade Commission
Date: Jan. 27, 2025

Issue: Whether the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) violated the Federal Trade Commission ACT (FTCA) and Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by promulgating the Combating Auto Retail Scams Trade Regulations Rule (CARS Rule) without publishing an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR).

Case Summary: In a 2-1 decision, a Fifth Circuit panel vacated the CARS Rule, ruling the FTC violated the FTCA by promulgating the rule without first issuing an ANPR.

On January 4, 2024, the FTC issued the final CARS Rule targeting bait-and-switch tactics and hidden fees by auto dealers. The rule has four key provisions: prohibiting specific misrepresentations; requiring certain disclosures; banning valueless add-ons; and mandating express, informed consumer consent before charging any fees. On the same day, the National Automobile Dealers Association, and the Texas Automobile Dealers Association (collectively petitioners) petitioned the Fifth Circuit, challenging the procedural validity of the rule.  The petitioners argued the FTC violated its own regulations by failing to issue an ANPR before promulgating the CARS Rule. They also contended the FTC’s cost-benefit analysis was arbitrary and capricious.

The panel ruled that the FTC’s statutory authority for the CARS Rule stems from § 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act, which requires an ANPR under the FTC’s internal regulations, rather than § 1029(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which does not require an ANPR. In effect, the panel ruled that the FTC violated its own regulations by not issuing an ANPR, emphasizing that “it is a given of administrative law that agencies must follow their own regulations.”

The panel also rejected the FTC’s argument that its failure to issue an ANPR was a harmless error, ruling that the petitioners had demonstrated sufficient prejudice. In the panel’s view, the lack of an ANPR deprived the petitioners of a procedural benefit and drew into question the substance of the FTC’s decision. The panel explained, “NADA has shown that it is far from clear that the failure to issue an ANPR had no bearing on the procedure used or the substance of decision reached. This was not harmless error.”

Finally, the panel refused to defer to the FTC’s interpretation under Kisor v. Wilke. Under Kisor, a court must defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous regulation. However, the panel found no relevant ambiguity in the FTC’s regulatory framework.

Judge Stephen Higginson dissented, arguing that the petitioners had ample opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process through public roundtables and comments. Judge Higginson noted that the FTC held public roundtables for a decade and reviewed hundreds of comments about unfair practices by car dealers before it issued the rule. As explained by Judge Higginson, NADA failed to prove prejudice or show that the FTC’s rulemaking process was arbitrary or capricious, and in his view, the majority’s decision is “regrettable.”

Bottom Line: As of March 1, 2025, the FTC has not filed for an en banc (full panel) petition for rehearing.

Documents: Brief

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: June 9

Uncategorized
June 9, 2025

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Preliminary injunction denied in bid to delay Capital One’s Discover purchase

Preliminary injunction denied in bid to delay Capital One’s Discover purchase

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

A California federal court denied a group of consumers’ motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to delay Capital One’s impending purchase of Discover.

Third Circuit reverses FCRA lawsuit against Nissan over lease dispute

Third Circuit reverses FCRA lawsuit against Nissan over lease dispute

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

A unanimous Third Circuit panel reversed a New Jersey federal court decision and ruled that a jury could find Nissan’s credit reporting inaccurate and its investigation unreasonable under the FCRA.

Green Dot agrees to pay Federal Reserve $44 Million to resolve UDAP allegations.

ABA, co-plaintiffs file joint motion with Federal Reserve to stay proceedings in stress test lawsuit

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

ABA and its co-plaintiffs filed a joint motion with the Fed to stay proceedings in their lawsuit claiming the Fed’s stress testing framework violates the APA.

U.S. Supreme Court vacates Ninth Circuit preemption decision

U.S. Supreme Court clarifies wire fraud liability

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a defendant may be convicted of federal fraud for inducing a victim to enter into a transaction under materially false pretenses, even if the defendant did not intend to...

Eleventh Circuit revives cash advance fraud lawsuit against Citigroup

Eleventh Circuit revives cash advance fraud lawsuit against Citigroup

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

In a unanimous decision, an Eleventh Circuit panel reversed and remanded a district court’s dismissal of a lawsuit alleging Citigroup operated a cash advance fraud scheme.

NEWSBYTES

ABA, associations urge CFPB to rescind changes to adjudication process

June 13, 2025

ABA DataBank: May inflation cooler than expected, but still above Fed’s 2% target

June 13, 2025

Consumer sentiment rebounds in June

June 13, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025
Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

March 15, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025

Podcast: What bankers need to know about ‘First Amendment audits’

June 5, 2025

Podcast: Accelerating banking for quick-service restaurants

May 8, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.