ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

VyStar Credit Union agrees to pay $1.5 million to resolve CFPB allegations of faulty online banking

December 2, 2024
Reading Time: 2 mins read
U.S. Supreme Court rules CFPB’s funding structure is constitutional

Online Banking
In re VyStar Credit Union
Date: October 31, 2024

Issue: VyStar Credit Union’s consent order with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to resolve allegations claiming its botched rollout of its online banking platform caused customers to lose access to their accounts.

Case Summary: VyStar Credit Union agreed to pay $1.5 million to resolve the CFPB’s allegations that the botched rollout of its online banking platform caused customers to lose access to their accounts.

In May 2022, VyStar attempted to launch a new virtual banking platform that would disable the older platform and replace it with systems designed by their vendor. VyStar originally envisioned that their platform would only have a brief interruption of services from May 13 to May 15, 2022, as they transitioned to the new platform. But according to the CFPB, members could not log into their accounts, forcing the platform to be taken offline from May 17 to May 22, 2022. From May 23 to December 2022, members allegedly had to use a limited version of the platform lacking previously used features, such as access to account statements, making internal transfers, credit card and loan payments, setting up recurring payments, and accessing full transaction histories. The mobile application was also allegedly unavailable for a month after the initial failure and had to slowly reintroduce basic banking features.

In addition, the bureau pointed to inconveniences suffered by consumers which were allegedly compounded by Vystar’s response effort. According to the CFPB, virtual waiting rooms were created to maintain stability in the limited version, forcing customers to wait in queues, potentially for hours. CFPB also alleged that phone calls to VyStar’s call center could not meet their consumer’s needs with a 250% increase in calls and a high drop rate of 31% to 44% for months. Consumers going to physical branches of the bank also experienced long waiting times. Thus, the CFPB claimed that without the abilities of the precursor platform, consumers could not fully perform their banking needs.

The CFPB also claimed that the faulty online banking rollout greatly diminished consumers’ ability to effectively manage their finances. With members less able to access account balances, transfer funds, and make payments on credit cards and loans, they were allegedly forced to take on unnecessary risks. These risks included delayed or deleted scheduled payments, incurring non-sufficient funds fees, overdraft fees, late fees, bounced check fees, interest payments for late charges and harm to credit reports.

In addition, the CFPB claimed the online banking platform’s collapse was caused by VyStar’s failure to establish reasonable management and governance processes and procedures. CFPB alleged that VyStar hired a vendor who was inexperienced in complex projects involving conversion from one platform to a new one and VyStar did not partake in standard risk management practices. The CFPB also alleged that VyStar did not adjust the timeline to launch the new platform, favoring speed and cost-cutting.

Bottom Line: VyStar did not admit to or deny the CFPB’s allegations.

Document: Consent Order

Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Beyond Surveillance: Rethinking Security for Modern Financial Institutions

Beyond Surveillance: Rethinking Security for Modern Financial Institutions

Sponsored Content
August 12, 2026

Sponsored content presented by Axis Communications For decades, physical security within financial institutions has been largely reactive. Security teams investigated incidents after they occurred, using recorded video to understand what happened and support response efforts. While this approach...

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Department of State: Aug. 10

Uncategorized
August 10, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Department of State.

ABA, trade groups: CFPB has no authority to enact rule limiting arbitration 

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to clarify Federal Arbitration Act’s application to bankruptcy claims

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

ABA filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit decision holding that the FAA does not require courts to enforce arbitration agreements covering claims under Section 362(k) of the Bankruptcy Code.

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. District Court of Oregon to enjoin Oregon’s rate opt-out law

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. District Court of Oregon to enjoin Oregon’s rate opt-out law

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the U.S. District Court of Oregon to grant a preliminary injunction to prevent Oregon from enforcing its “rate opt-out law.”

Post-Cantero, Ninth Circuit rules NBA does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow law

ABA files amicus brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to settle circuit split on NBA preemption for interest on escrow laws

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision holding that the National Bank Act does not preempt California’s interest-on-escrow law.

Southern District of New York dismisses Block customer data breach class action

Block Inc. agrees to pay $45 million to resolve Cash App fraud allegations

Uncategorized
August 5, 2026

Block Inc. will pay $45 million to 46 states to resolve allegations that it misled Cash App users about the app's security and failed to protect them from fraud.

NEWSBYTES

ABA cautions against allowing state regulation that could expand stablecoin issuer activities

August 13, 2026

FinCEN: Financial institutions flagged nearly $5B linked to suspected human smuggling

August 13, 2026

Mortgage rates tick down

August 13, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Beyond Surveillance: Rethinking Security for Modern Financial Institutions

Beyond Surveillance: Rethinking Security for Modern Financial Institutions

August 12, 2026
Relationship Banking at Scale: Why Banks Need The Digital Sales & Service Platform

Relationship Banking at Scale: Why Banks Need The Digital Sales & Service Platform

August 1, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

Examiners Are Now Looking at Your Non-Core Systems

June 11, 2026
Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

June 1, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

Podcast: Tactics for meaningful strategic planning

July 28, 2026

Podcast: Why it might be time to revisit a key FDIC ratio

July 23, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.