ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Uncategorized

2nd Circuit rules JP Morgan’s syndicated loan is not a security

October 2, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
2nd Circuit rules JP Morgan’s syndicated loan is not a security

Securities
Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
Date: Aug. 24, 2023

Issue: Whether a syndicated bank loan qualifies as a security and thus is subject to securities laws.

Case Summary: In a 3-0 decision, a Second Circuit panel ruled syndicated term loans are not securities under state blue sky or U.S. federal securities laws.

Millennium Health LLC, a urine drug testing company, received a $1.775 billion syndicated loan from multiple banks for financial assistance. Millennium received the loan, then dispersed it to roughly 70 institutional investors. Millennium functioned as arrangers for syndicated credit facilities. Shortly after receiving the loan, Millennium lost a lawsuit regarding alleged kickbacks. Millennium also settled with the U.S. Department of Justice regarding possible violations of the False Claims Act. Millennium later filed for bankruptcy.

Marc S. Kirschner, a bankruptcy trustee, sued on behalf of hedge funds, mutual funds and other institutional entities that purchased notes in the syndicated loan. Kirschner argued the banks should have warned the note holders of the enforcement risks which would soon bankrupt Millennium. Kirschner also argued syndicated loans were securities and alleged the banks violated state securities laws of certain states, also known as blue sky laws. According to Kirschner, misstatements and omissions relating to the government investigation and civil lawsuit in the marketing materials for the loans violated securities laws. Defendants moved to dismiss, arguing the loan was not a security and therefore was not regulated by the state security laws. In 2020, the district court ruled that syndicated term loans were not securities under blue sky laws.

On appeal, the Second Circuit affirmed, concluding the court properly dismissed claims brought against defendants for alleged material misstatements and omissions for the loans, because plaintiff failed to plead facts plausibly suggesting that syndicated loans are securities. In reaching its decision, the Second Circuit applied the four-factor Reeves test articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1990—the motivations that would prompt a reasonable seller and buyer to enter into the “transaction”; the plan of distribution of the instrument; the reasonable expectations of the investing public; and whether some factor such as the existence of another regulator scheme significantly reduces the risk of the instrument, thereby rendering application of the Securities Acts unnecessary.

The panel determined the first Reeves factor—the motivation of the seller and buyer of the debt instrument—weighed in favor of finding the term loan was a security. According to the panel, the lenders expected to profit from the term loan because they were entitled to receive quarterly interest payments over the course of seven years, indicating an investment motive. At the same time, the company’s motivations were not investment-focused because it planned to repay its outstanding credit facility instead of growing the business. On balance, the Second Circuit concluded this factor weighed in favor of finding that the complaint plausibly alleged that the term loan was a security.

The panel determined the second Reeves factor—plan of distribution of the debt instrument—weighed against finding the term loans were securities. The court explained when a note is made available to a large portion of the public, it is more likely to be a security. Here, though, the court explained the notes were offered only to sophisticated institutional entities and they received a Confidential Information Memorandum. The notes were unavailable to the general public and, thus, this factor persuaded the court against the term loans being securities.

The panel determined the third Reeves factor—reasonable expectations of the investing public—weighed against finding the term loans were securities. In the panel’s view, the lenders were sophisticated and experienced institutional entities with ample notice that the term loans were not securities. The panel reasoned the lenders had to certify they were experienced in extending credit to entities like Millennium Health and that they had conducted their own diligence. For these reasons, the court concluded the lenders could not reasonably have perceived the loans to be securities.

The panel determined the Fourth Reeves factor—whether there is another regulatory scheme that reduces the investment risks associated with the instrument—weighed against finding the loan terms were securities. According to the panel, the complaint plausibly suggested the term loans were securities because both were secured by collateral and federal banking regulators have issued policy guidance addressing syndicated loans. Because the term loans were secured by first-priority liens on substantially all the company’s assets, the panel reasoned the risk associated with purchasing the term loans was reduced.

Bottom Line: The Second Circuit’s decision reaffirms the longstanding view that syndicated loans are not securities under securities laws.

Documents: Opinion

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Banking Docket
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA files coalition amicus brief urging Supreme Court to reject class certification for uninjured class members

U.S. Supreme Court declines to address class certification for uninjured members

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Labcorp’s appeal as “improvidently granted,” effectively letting stand the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that upheld class certification despite including uninjured members.

Capital One agrees to pay $425 million to resolve 360 Performance Savings Account allegations

Virginia federal court trims influencers lawsuit against Capital One

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

A Virginia federal court partially granted a motion to dismiss filed by a class of social media influencers alleging Capital One’s coupon-search browser extension stole from content creators.

First Circuit rules federal law does not preempt Puerto Rico’s credit card surcharge law

First Circuit rules federal law does not preempt Puerto Rico’s credit card surcharge law

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

In a unanimous decision, a First Circuit panel ruled that Puerto Rico’s Law 150 is not preempted by the Cash Discount Act or the Durbin Amendment.

U.S. Supreme Court grants petition to examine post-judgment relief in Hamas banking lawsuit

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Hamas victims’ attempt to revive bank lawsuit

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) applies only in “extraordinary circumstances,” even where the movant seeks to reopen a case to...

Seventh Circuit revives CFPB’s lender redlining lawsuit

Illinois federal court denies joint motion to vacate redlining settlement

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

An Illinois federal court denied the joint motion by the CFPB and Townstone to vacate the settlement in the bureau’s redlining lawsuit against the company.

U.S. Supreme Court vacates Ninth Circuit preemption decision

U.S. Supreme Court rules Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings

Uncategorized
July 1, 2025

In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings to a federal agency’s interpretation of the statute.

NEWSBYTES

Congress sends budget bill to president with numerous ABA-backed provisions

July 3, 2025

Factory orders increased in May

July 3, 2025

International trade deficit increased in May

July 3, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.