ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Commercial Lending

The Changing Climate of Credit Risk Management

December 27, 2019
Reading Time: 3 mins read
The Changing Climate of Credit Risk Management

By Amnon Levy and Frank Freitas

While credit portfolio managers generally recognize that physical climate risk needs to be accounted for, questions and misconceptions abound. The potential manifestations of climate change and their impacts on economic outcomes are only beginning to be understood, and it is likely that investments in resilience and risk reduction will lag understanding.

While bankers are increasingly managing risks related to changes in policy and technology (also known as transition risk), physical risks are not necessarily an obvious set of primary factors for banks’ commercial credit portfolio managers originating credit with maturities of three to seven years. Instead, market participants assume climate effects will prevail over long-term horizons, more than 20 to 30 years into the future. Thus, there is a mismatch between investment horizons and the expected arrival of climate change-driven financial effects.

Having said that, it is increasingly difficult to disassociate credit risk from climate risk. Climate effects that bankers need to consider manifest not just as gradual changes in temperature or sea levels, but also as increases in the frequency and intensity of acute weather events. The past few years have produced several record-breaking loss events, with the mounting costs of billion-dollar disasters ranging from hurricanes and typhoons to flooding and fires. The Pacific Gas and Electric bankruptcy following a 2018 California wildfire season that set records for destructiveness may be a precursor of what is to come, with obvious implications for sectors such as transportation, agriculture and energy. The result is driving bankers (and insurance companies) to be ever more cognizant of the need to quantify these risks and their impacts across banks’ portfolios. From real estate exposures to loan books, virtually no asset class is immune to these increased risks.

A less obvious and certainly less discussed—but possibly the most important—financial factor that should drive credit portfolio managers to consider climate change impacts on their portfolios is the association between a firm’s enterprise value, credit quality and long-run cash-flow generation. As a rule, more than half a firm’s value can be attributed to cash flows beyond 20 or 30 years. In our view, a firm’s viability and creditworthiness can vary materially across climate scenarios that may unfold over the relatively short horizon of three to five years and become increasingly compromised during that shorter time horizon.

Climate change effects on corporations can take many forms. Understanding these pathways is a critical step to the evaluation and management of risks. First, climate change can affect a firm’s value directly and across the value chain through both acute and chronic pathways. Extreme weather can disrupt supply chains, render facilities inoperable and compromise consumers’ ability to purchase goods and services that are the outputs of corporate activities. Climate change can also indirectly influence corporate viability by negatively influencing the broader environment within which corporations operate—resulting, for example, in large-scale population migration, ecosystem collapse and loss of social license to operate. Both direct and indirect effects can affect corporate performance and therefore require quantitative rigor and diligence to model.

Companies can also take direct action to bolster their response to climate change and, in doing so, improve their long-term viability. Through assiduous investment in hardening of facilities and protection of employees, companies can create outcomes that benefit their shareholders as well as the communities they serve.

The misalignment of the investment holding period and the time frame in which the effects of climate change will be felt stems from misguided assumptions. We already see the economic effects of extreme weather today, and the sooner we are able to effectively model and quantify pathways between climate events and credit, the better we will be able to invest in outcomes which prevent outsized market corrections in the future.

Amnon Levy is managing director and head of portfolio and balance sheet research at Moody’s Analytics. Frank Freitas is chief development officer at Four Twenty Seven, a provider of market intelligence on the economic risk of climate change.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Climate changeCredit risk
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA donates to Texas flood relief efforts, urges bankers to contribute

FDIC issues regulatory relief guidance for Texas

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

The FDIC released guidance with steps intended to provide regulatory relief to financial institutions and facilitate recovery in areas of Texas recently affected by severe storms and flooding.

BIS drafts guidance for central banks on AI adoption

BIS releases report on connections between banks and nonbanks

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

Differences between regulations for banks and those for nonbank financial intermediaries may have created incentives to shift business activities to the NBFI sector, so bank supervisors should apply “close scrutiny” to such interactions, according to the report.

Regulators take issue with discrimination definition in proposed appraisal standards

HUD reverses Biden-era policies on appraisal review

Compliance and Risk
July 11, 2025

HUD eliminated several of the core policies adopted by the Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity task force, an interagency group of 13 federal agencies formed during the Biden administration to address alleged discrimination in the appraisal process.

Fed releases agenda for upcoming conference on large bank capital requirements

Fed seeks public input on large bank rating system revision

Compliance and Risk
July 10, 2025

The Federal Reserve requested comment on a proposal to revise its supervisory rating framework for large bank holding companies to address the "well managed" status of the firms.

FinCEN, IRS-CI launch series to help banks combat fentanyl trafficking

FinCEN extends compliance dates for fentanyl orders

Compliance and Risk
July 9, 2025

FinCEN has extended by more than a month the effective dates for orders involving three Mexico-based financial institutions with alleged ties to fentanyl trafficking, according to an agency statement.

ABA Regulatory Policy and Compliance Inbox: Must banks disclose all co-branding relationships?

ABA Regulatory Policy and Compliance Inbox: Just what is reportable under CRA?

Compliance and Risk
July 9, 2025

What about refinances and renewals for small business, small farm and community development loans? And: Understanding risk-based pricing notices.

NEWSBYTES

ABA, associations seek clarity about Fannie, Freddie credit scoring change

July 11, 2025

ABA DataBank: Copper prices rise on tariff announcement

July 11, 2025

FDIC issues regulatory relief guidance for Texas

July 11, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.