ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Compliance and Risk

The Weeble Wobble Bureau

March 20, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read

By Dawn Causey, Thomas Pinder and Andrew Doersam

In the 1970s, most children knew the familiar catchphrase “Weebles wobble but they don’t fall down.” Weebles were popular egg-shaped toys with circular bottoms and painted faces. They were weighted at the bottom so that if they were pushed over they would immediately bounce back up. Similarly, in 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau suffered several setbacks in court, but each time, the agency bobbed back up and refused to temper its enforcement strategy.

The CFPB’s authority to pursue unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices claims is often broad, but not boundless. In March 2017, a North Dakota federal district court dismissed the CFPB’s UDAAP claim against Intercept, a third-party payment processor, and its executives. The CFPB alleged the defendants turned a blind eye to illegal or fraudulent transactions by ignoring red flags. However, the court was not convinced. Judge Ralph Erickson found the CFPB failed to show how Intercept’s actions specifically harmed consumers, holding that the CFPB’s UDAAP claim was overly broad and should have been more concrete.

In August, a Georgia federal district court sanctioned the CFPB attorneys for their “blatant disregard” to follow orders to state the factual basis to support claims against four payment processors and a telemarketing company. The CFPB did not present any exculpatory evidence to support its theory that the defendants placed millions of robocalls to threaten and harass consumers into collectively paying millions of dollars in what the agency described as “phantom debts” they did not owe. Judge Richard Story was incredulous. He determined that the CFPB’s unwillingness to present evidence reflected a bad faith effort to follow the court’s orders and dismissed several of the CFPB’s charges.

Regarding the CFPB’s remedial scope, the agency’s approach to consumer restitution in UDAAP cases is fairly routine: claim that every consumer who encountered a misleading or deceptive representation was affected, and as a result, should be compensated.

However, on Sept. 8, a California federal court rejected this approach. Judge Richard Seeborg refused to award $74 million in restitution and $24 million in penalties against Nationwide Biweekly Administration Inc. based on Nationwide’s allegedly deceptive marketing of its accelerated mortgage loan repayment program. Instead, the court ordered it to pay a statutory penalty of $7.3 million. While the court found a portion of Nationwide’s advertising was misleading, Seeborg found that Nationwide took affirmative compliance measures, such as training and seeking legal counsel. Consequently, the court held that Nationwide’s conduct was neither reckless nor intentional and reduced the CFPB’s almost $100 million monetary demand by more than 90 percent.

The same day, a Minnesota federal district court dismissed the CFPB’s claim that TCF National Bank committed technical violations of the opt-in regulation. The CFPB alleged that, by tricking consumers into signing up for overdraft services, the bank violated UDAAP, as well as the opt-in regulation requiring banks to obtain “affirmative consent” from consumers. Rejecting the opt-in claim, the court pointed out that the agency’s complaint failed to show that TCF did not obtain new customers’ consent. However, the court kept alive the CFPB’s UDAAP allegations. This ruling suggests that compliance with the CFPB’s regulatory regime may not foreclose UDAAP claims for the same underlying conduct.

The CFPB also claimed that Borders and Borders, a Kentucky law firm, established a web of shell companies to disguise improper client referral kickbacks as lawful profit-sharing. On July 12, a Kentucky federal district court determined that Borders qualified for a RESPA safe harbor provision which shelters “affiliated business arrangements,” as long as the arrangements are disclosed to the consumer. Because Borders disclosed these arrangements, the court found that agency failed to show how Borders received anything of value beyond their own interest.

The past year has shown that the CFPB is stubborn, but not infallible. Until recently, CFPB investigations have relied on high settlement rates from companies seeking to avoid bad publicity and the reputational harm that generally stems from protracted litigation. However, if more companies begin to challenge the CFPB in court, the agency’s settlement demands may begin to appear bloated and unrealistic.

Hopefully the recent shakeup in agency’s leadership will encourage the agency to learn from its losses. The weight of its recent losses should keep the “weeble wobble” down.

Dawn Causey is general counsel at ABA, where Thomas Pinder is SVP for litigation and Andrew Doersam is a paralegal.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: UDAAP
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

The future of careers in risk and compliance

The future of careers in risk and compliance

ABA Banking Journal Podcast
July 17, 2025

What does the future hold for bank risk and compliance professionals? Krysti Cunningham discusses the technological transformation in risk and compliance at community and midsize banks and applications for AI tools and LLMs in risk and compliance.

BIS: Stablecoins fail as ‘sound money’

ABA urges lawmakers to include safeguards in stablecoin bill

Compliance and Risk
July 17, 2025

A durable regulatory framework for stablecoins must balance the potential for enhancing payments with the need to limit negative economic consequences, promote financial stability and guard against consumer protection risks, ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols said in...

ABA urges FCC to combat illegal call spoofing

ABA urges FCC to impose call authentication requirement for non-IP networks, mandate IP transition

Compliance and Risk
July 16, 2025

ABA joined six trade associations in urging the FCC to adopt a proposal to create a new call authentication requirement designed to limit criminal access to the U.S. calling network.

ABA faults banking regulators for confusing CRA rule rollout

Banking agencies propose to rescind Community Reinvestment Act rule

Community Banking
July 16, 2025

The Federal Reserve, FDIC and OCC issued a joint proposal to rescind the Community Reinvestment Act final rule adopted in 2023.

CFPB releases mortgage servicing proposal, overhauls loss mitigation framework

FHFA releases FAQ about Fannie, Freddie credit score change

Compliance and Risk
July 16, 2025

FHFA released an FAQ on the recent announcement that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will expand credit scoring options. Fannie and Freddie have also created webpages about the planned implementation of the policy.

Capturing These Three Data Types Can Transform Your Fraud Monitoring

ABA Fraudcast: How the ABA Foundation helps banks protect their customers

Compliance and Risk
July 16, 2025

As more older Americans are major targets for criminals, Safe Banking for Seniors is an effective program to inform and defend against targeted scams.

NEWSBYTES

House passes bills on stablecoins, digital assets, CBDCs

July 17, 2025

Business inventories hold steady in May

July 17, 2025

Mortgage rates rise

July 17, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

The future of careers in risk and compliance

July 17, 2025

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.