ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: April 2025

Opting out of information sharing under Regulations P and V—is the timing the same?

April 21, 2025
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Compliance question of the month: February 2025

My bank has a question regarding our privacy notice and affiliate sharing. The bank’s privacy notice states that it shares customer information both with nonaffiliated third parties and with our affiliates for marketing purposes and that customers may opt out of having this information shared. The bank gives consumers 30 days to opt out before it begins sharing.

Q However, looking at Regulation V (Fair Credit Reporting Act or FCRA) §1022.24(b)(3)-(4), it appears that the bank does not have to wait 30 days if it presents the privacy notice to customers at the time of an online account opening or in person. Am I interpreting this portion correctly?

A Not quite. Though not explicit, it appears the regulation considers that, for accounts opened online or in person, 30 days is a “reasonable time to opt out.”

The examples in Regulation V’s §1022.24(b)(3) and (b)(4) that you cite indicate that requiring the consumer to decide to opt out before completing the opt-out notice electronically or in-person is a “reasonable opportunity to opt out” for “transactions.” Specifically, §1022.24(b)(3) provides, “The consumer is required to decide, as a necessary part of proceeding with the transaction, whether to opt out before completing the transaction.” (emphasis added) Section 1022.24(b)(4) uses similar terminology for in-person “transactions.”

In contrast, §1022.24 (b)(2) provides that, in the situation where the consumer has “obtained a product or service” through a website, a reasonable opportunity to opt out is 30 days. (emphasis added) The difference in the terminology suggests the examples in §1022.24(b)(3) and (b)(4) do not anticipate an account opening situation but an isolated transaction.

Moreover, under §1022.24(b)(5), if the bank includes the Regulation V opt-out notice with the Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act privacy opt-out notice (Regulation P), it must allow consumers to opt out “within a reasonable period of time” and in the same manner as the opt-out under Regulation P. Regulation P states that, for opening an account online, allowing consumers 30 days after the date the consumer receives the opt-out notice is a “reasonable opportunity” to opt out. (§1016.10(a)(3)) Regulation P provides other examples similar to those of Regulation V. Notably, its example allowing consumers to opt out at the time of the “transaction” is limited to “isolated transactions” such as “the purchase of a cashier’s check.” (§1016.10(a)(3)(iii))

Bottom line—while it is not explicit, the use of different terms in Regulation V’s examples and its example of referencing the Regulation P opt-out notice suggests that consumers should have 30 days to opt out under Regulation V when they open an account.

For more information, contact ABA’s Leslie Callaway.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

Tags: ComplianceFCRA
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: October 14

Uncategorized
October 14, 2025

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Terrorism and money laundering aggregates published: April through June 2024

Terrorism and money laundering aggregates published: July through September 2025

Uncategorized
October 6, 2025

The FinCEN 314(a) Updates section is published on a periodic basis to better capture the trend line for 314(a) usage. The following is an update from July through September 2025.

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: October 6

Uncategorized
October 6, 2025

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Compliance question of the month: February 2025

Compliance question of the month: October 2025

Uncategorized
October 6, 2025

Compliance QOTM clears up the crediting interest and fees under Regulation E and the definition of a new account under Regulation CC.

CFPB issues interim final rule for Libor transition

Second Circuit affirms dismissal of LIBOR manipulation claims

Uncategorized
October 1, 2025

A unanimous Second Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit accusing UBS AG and other global banks of conspiring to manipulate LIBOR, ruling the plaintiffs failed to show they actually lost money from the alleged scheme.

Southern District of New York dismisses Block customer data breach class action

Southern District of New York dismisses Block customer data breach class action

Uncategorized
October 1, 2025

A New York federal court dismissed a consolidated class action that alleged Block Inc. made false statements about its data security related to a former employee’s data breach.

NEWSBYTES

ABA: Same BSA regulations should apply to banks, digital assets

October 17, 2025

ABA asks Fed, administration to maintain full penny deposit services

October 17, 2025

Nacha adopts new rules to enhance international ACH transactions

October 17, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

October 1, 2025
What good looks like in Small Business Lending – and how to get there

What good looks like in Small Business Lending – and how to get there

October 1, 2025
The Connectivity Dividend

The Connectivity Dividend

September 1, 2025
Building Trust with Every Transaction

Building Trust with Every Transaction

September 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: From tractors to drones, how farming tech affects ag lending

October 16, 2025

Podcast: Bigger data boosts financial inclusion at Synchrony

October 9, 2025

Podcast: AI and the future of BSA risk management

October 2, 2025

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.