ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

Employment and Health Effects from COVID-19 Containment Measures

August 24, 2020
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Photo by Tom Barrett on Unsplash

Milwaukee's Downer Theatre is closed due to COVID-19. Photo by Tom Barrett

By Veronica Carrion
ABA Economic Research Associate

Five months have passed since the coronavirus pandemic shut down the United States. More than five million Americans have contracted the virus, and more than 160,000 have died from it. Business closures across the country left more than 20 million Americans without jobs. Despite progress in the last three months’ job reports and the quick action of Paycheck Protection Program lenders, the unemployment rate sits at 10.2%.

States have grappled with tough decisions balancing the needs of public health and the economy. While all states have begun at least some phase of reopening, they have taken different approaches and moved at different speeds. As new data has emerged, it appears that states that were faster to reopen saw increased coronavirus spread with uneven economic benefits.

Early openers versus stringent states

States on the Pacific coast and in the Northeast responded quickly in March, shutting down businesses and implementing stay-at-home orders as the first coronavirus hotspots emerged in New York and Washington. Southern states were slower to respond, and shutdowns did not last as long, with reopenings beginning as early as April.

New York, New Jersey, Washington, and New Mexico implemented some of the most stringent policies to control the spread of the virus. Measures taken included a 100 percent transition to remote work for office workers, closure of nonessential businesses, mandatory face coverings while in public, bans on social gatherings of all sizes, and fines for violating social distancing rules. The most cautious states started reopening in June after reaching certain health metrics. Retail and food establishments are still restricted to curbside pickup, entertainment venues remain closed and mask requirements are still strictly enforced.

By contrast, Texas, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina imposed more modest restrictions. By late April, Georgia allowed gyms, personal care salons, restaurant dining, and movie theaters to reopen. Texas, Florida and South Carolina began their phase-one reopenings in early May. Less populous states varied in their responses. Rather than issue stay-at-home orders, Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota instead opted for mandates enforcing social distancing, following Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hygiene practices, and closing personal care salons.

Effects on employment

Nationally, continuing claims dropped slightly to 19.5 million in late July, down from May’s peak reading of 24.9 million. With the limited resumption of economic activity, unemployment rates were lower in 42 states, higher in five and stable in three states and D.C.

Many states that opened early or implemented more lenient restrictions—such as Texas, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida—hoped to get people back to work more quickly and limit damage to their local economies. This was of particular concern in states with large hospitality and tourism sectors, which were hit hard by social distancing policies. Florida, for instance, saw a brief surge in continuing claims, before they began to reopen. While reopening appeared to temporarily reduce unemployment, the rate edged back up as COVID-19 cases began to rise. Florida’s mandatory stay-at-home order expired in May. As cases began to surge the state took action to reverse reopenings by prohibiting bars from selling alcohol.

Compared to the country in aggregate, densely populated lenient states saw no faster decline in unemployment as a result of reopening early. Despite reopening in May, South Carolina’s unemployment rate has edged down at the same slow pace as cautious states. Georgia has been one of the hardest-hit states in the country, with insured unemployment peaking at 20 percent in April. While the state has regained 47 percent of jobs lost from February to April, a surge in new cases appears to be slowing down its economic recovery.

Meanwhile, rural states have largely held unemployment below 10 percent and are out-performing more populous states. Idaho’s unemployment rate peaked in late April at 10 percent but steadily declined to 3.4 percent by the end of July. Idaho—which does not rely as heavily on the leisure and hospitality industries that were particularly affected by the pandemic—now has the lowest insured unemployment rate across the nation, according to the Department of Labor’s weekly claims report. Like Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Indiana have seen their unemployment rates steadily decrease since April. The labor forces of these states are largely concentrated in trade, transportation, and utilities; education and health services; and government work.

Among states with more restrictive social distancing measures, the insured unemployment rate has held fairly steady as many businesses remain closed. One outlier, Washington state, saw a spike in continuing claims in early May that retreated in June. This may be explained by the unusually high number of fraudulent claims filed in the state, which amounted to $550 million to $650 million worth of fraud.

The decision to open early or remain closed did not appear to materially impact the unemployment rate of different states, especially in regions with large leisure and hospitality workforces. Businesses continue to struggle. Google mobility data shows that consumers are still avoiding open retail and food establishments, and polls suggest that 51 percent of voters feel the country as a whole is moving too fast to reopen and many agree that continuing social distancing is worth the economic cost.

Effects on public health

The effects of closures and re-openings on the spread of COVID-19 are much clearer. Despite the short- and medium-term economic consequences, cautious states focused on flattening the curve and limiting the spread to prepare for safer, longer-lasting reopenings. Stringent states have either limited the spread throughout the pandemic or seen their initially high case numbers fall.

By contrast, less restrictive states began to see their case numbers rise in June as stay-at-home orders were lifted. As a result, many governors have paused reopening plans or re-closed segments of their states. Forty-eight states saw an increase in coronavirus cases over the last few weeks. Rural states with meatpacking and correctional facilities saw high per-capita infection rates. The U.S. hit a record single-day spike of 60,000 cases in mid-July—with Arizona, Florida, California and Texas accounting for nearly half of all new cases.

* * *

Despite the recent promising jobs reports and initial optimism as states reopened, unemployment remains elevated, daily COVID-19 cases are rising in several states (including North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois) and 24 states have paused or reversed their reopening plans amidst rising case numbers. While some less restrictive states saw temporary reductions in unemployment as they reopened, the resulting spikes in coronavirus have raised questions about the longevity of those improvements.

Tags: ABA DataBankCoronavirusEmployment situationReturn to normal operations
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA Data Bank: Markets revise March rate hike expectations

ABA DataBank: Probability of Fed hikes in 2026 on the rise

Economy
June 18, 2026

The new FOMC Chair struck a notably hawkish tone, signaling potential policy tightening if price pressures persist. As a result, expectations for a 2026 rate hike have risen significantly, with nine FOMC participants now projecting at least one...

Mortgage rates fall

Mortgage rates drop

Economy
June 18, 2026

The rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.47% this week. The rate for a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.81%.

FDIC, OCC tighten policy considerations for bank merger applications

Report: Bank merger activity slowed despite easing regulatory pressure

Community Banking
June 18, 2026

The pace of bank merger and acquisition announcements slowed during the first half of 2026 despite increased certainty about regulatory approvals, with broader economic uncertainty driving the slowdown, according to a new analysis by PwC.

Warsh to launch review of how Fed sets monetary policy

Warsh to launch review of how Fed sets monetary policy

Economy
June 17, 2026

In his first press conference as Federal Reserve chairman, Kevin Warsh announced he is forming five task forces to study various aspects of monetary policy, from the central bank’s use of data to its handling of the balance...

FOMC minutes: Persistent inflation clouds path forward

FOMC again holds rates steady

Economy
June 17, 2026

The Federal Open Market Committee voted to maintain the target range of the federal funds rate at 3.5%-3.75%. The vote was unanimous.

NAR: Pending home sales slipped in May

NAR: Pending home sales rose 3.8% in May

Economy
June 17, 2026

Pending home sales in May rose 3.8% from the prior month and 4.8% year over year, according to the National Association of Realtors.

NEWSBYTES

House passes bipartisan housing bill

June 23, 2026

White House directs agencies, contractors to protect systems from quantum computing

June 23, 2026

FHA ends field review requirement for certain mortgages

June 23, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

Examiners Are Now Looking at Your Non-Core Systems

June 11, 2026
Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

Your Floorplan Audit and Your Credit Decision Are Weeks Apart. That Gap Has a Price.

June 1, 2026
A Modern Blueprint for Serving High-Net-Worth Families

A Modern Blueprint for Serving High-Net-Worth Families

May 28, 2026
Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

AI Is in Your Bank. Is Your Cloud Contract Governing It?

May 20, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Talent and innovation in community banking

June 18, 2026

Podcast: Understanding bank regulators’ guidance on illegal immigration

June 11, 2026

Podcast: Creating a feeling of welcome, for customers and new bankers

May 28, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.