ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Economy

Corporate Tax Rates and a Financial Transactions Tax in 2020

December 26, 2019
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Leveraged Lending Is Rising, But Bank Exposure Is Limited

By Curtis Dubay

With the 2020 election cycle underway, heated discussions on taxes will be part of the drama. Democratic presidential contenders have floated several tax increases already, including a carbon tax, wealth taxes and higher income tax rates on high-income families. Banks of course need to assess how higher tax rates on individuals would impact their customers and themselves in the case of Subchapter S banks. But it will be proposals for a higher corporate tax rate and a financial transactions tax that would have the greatest negative impacts for the industry.

The 2018 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. This large rate reduction was necessary because the U.S. had fallen far out of step with global corporate income tax rates. For example, the average rate in the OECD was below 25 percent, while the U.S. was still at 35 percent. The rate cut helped all U.S. businesses, including banks, and created incentives to expand operations.

Proposals vary, but a corporate rate increase to 22, 25 or 28 percent is in the range of possibilities under a Democratic administration. Raising the cost to all businesses would very likely cause loan demand to fall, hurting investment and slowing growth in communities.

Several candidates also propose to implement an FTT between 0.1 percent and 0.5 percent. Although the rate makes an FTT seem innocuous, it would have a significant negative effect on investors, the economy and the banking industry.

An FTT would apply to financial transactions like the sale of stock, partnership interests, bonds (potentially including municipal bonds and Treasurys), other forms of indebtedness (potentially including loan sales) and derivatives.

Banks would pay the tax each time they purchase covered securities. This would raise their costs, which could lead to higher interest rates for borrowers, lower rates for depositors and lower earnings for shareholders. If an FTT were applied to loan sales, purchasers could likely reduce the price they are willing to pay for loans.

An FTT would also increase compliance costs. In cases where they are an intermediary for a transaction, whether making purchases on behalf of customers, or facilitating a transaction between parties, banks will have to record the amount of tax and transmit payment to the IRS. The systems to report, monitor, and audit will be expensive and take away resources that could have been used to meet the financial needs of the community.

Most proposed FTTs generally include derivatives. Taxing derivatives would increase costs for banks that use such contracts to hedge risk and make it less economical for them to engage in such transactions. This could increase risk in the banking system if the cost increase significantly increases the cost of issuing derivatives. Farm banks in particular will have to keep a close watch, since farmers are a larger user of derivatives to hedge their risks.

Aside from the impact on banks, an FTT would drive down asset values, which will hurt investors, which now include a majority of Americans that save for retirement through IRAs and 401(k)s. Defined benefit pension plans would also feel a pinch, especially public retirement plans that depend on increasing asset values to meet their obligations to retirees.

Other countries that have tried an FTT—such as the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Sweden—have all experienced trouble with the tax. These problems include reduced share values, reduced trading volumes (which reduces liquidity), financial industry jobs moving to other countries and revenue coming in below what estimators anticipated. The U.S. should expect to experience similar troubles if it adopts one too.

This year will undoubtedly bring more policies that effect the banking industry, both negatively and—hopefully—positively. ABA will be very engaged in any discussion of new taxes—as we were in support of the 2017 tax law—providing detailed analysis of the impact on loan demand and economic growth of any proposed change.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: Tax reform
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA, associations urge lawmakers to finalize deal on debt ceiling

Congress sends budget bill to president with numerous ABA-backed provisions

Ag Banking
July 3, 2025

Included in the bill were several ABA-supported tax provisions related to banks, including a modified version of the ABA-advocated ACRE Act and the permanent extension of the Section 199A pass-through deduction rate of 20%.

Factory orders increased in May

Economy
July 3, 2025

New orders for manufactured goods in May, up five of the last six months, increased $48.5 billion or 8.2% to $642.0 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau reported today. This followed a 3.9% April decrease. New orders for manufactured...

International trade deficit increased in May

Economy
July 3, 2025

The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis announced today that the goods and services deficit was $71.5 billion in May, up $11.3 billion from $60.3 billion in April, revised. The May increase in the...

ISM: Service sector expanded in June

Economy
July 3, 2025

Economic activity in the services sector grew in June after contracting for just one month. The ISM Services Index indicated expansion at 50.8%, above the 50% breakeven point for the 11th time in the last 12 months. “Ten...

147,000 Jobs Added in June, Unemployment Rate Steady at 4.1%

Economy
July 3, 2025

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 147,000 in June, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 4.1%, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The number of unemployed people, at 7.0 million, changed little over the...

ADP: 33,000 jobs lost in June

Economy
July 3, 2025

The non-farm private sector lost 33,000 jobs in June, and annual pay was up 4.4% year-over-year, according to the ADP National Employment Report. This follows a downward revision of May’s report from 37,000 jobs added to 29,000.Small businesses...

NEWSBYTES

Congress sends budget bill to president with numerous ABA-backed provisions

July 3, 2025

Factory orders increased in May

July 3, 2025

International trade deficit increased in May

July 3, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.