ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Compliance and Risk

Understanding State Exceptions to the VA’s One Percent Fee Rule

September 5, 2019
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Understanding State Exceptions to the VA’s One Percent Fee Rule

By John I. Vong

Originating mortgages today can be an expensive business for banks—no matter what size. According to the June 2019 Stratmor Group Insights Report, last year, large banks spent $13,628 in expenses per loan in 2018, while smaller regional banks spent 66 percent less, or $8,985 per loan. With production revenue estimated to be $8,411 per loan in Q4 2018 according to Mortgage Banker Association research, many banks are struggling to turn a profit and cannot afford to turn away any opportunities.

Although they only represent approximately 10 percent of the home mortgage market, loans backed by the VA have become a critical part of many bankers’ origination mixes. And soon these loans may be an even bigger part of the mix. In June, Congress passed, and President Trump signed, a bill that eliminates the conforming loan limit cap on VA loans, allowing veterans to borrow more than the 2019 conforming limit of $484,350 for most counties without any down payment.

When originating VA loans, however, bankers must strictly adhere to the limitations on the fees and charges that the veteran borrower pays or face the consequences. A couple of years ago, the New York Department of Financial Services ordered a large mortgage lender $1.1 million for overcharging on VA loans. And in May 2019, the VA inspector general, in cooperation with the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of New York, subpoenaed at least eight lenders, asking them to turn over hundreds of files on VA loans made between 2013 and 2017 to investigate if they overcharged borrowers.

Under VA guidelines, a borrower can pay a maximum of “reasonable and customary amounts for any or all of the ‘itemized fees and charges’ designated by VA.” This includes allowable third-party charges such as appraisal and compliance inspections; recording fees; credit report; prepaid items, such as taxes and assessments; hazard insurance; flood zone determination; survey, if required by the lender or veteran; title examination and title insurance; special mailing fees for refinancing loans; and a Mortgage Electronic Registration System fee.

In addition, bankers may charge a borrower a flat fee equal to one percent of the loan to cover origination, processing and underwriting costs that are not reimbursable as itemized fees and charges. Fees and charges that the VA believes should be covered in the flat fee include lender’s appraisals; lender’s inspections, except in construction loan cases; loan closing or settlement fees; document preparation fees; attorney’s services other than for title work; interest rate lock-in fees; escrow fees or charges; notary fees; trustee’s fees or charges; loan application or processing fees; and tax service fees.

While charging the flat one percent fee is common, bankers can also choose to itemize these costs—but the total of all unallowable fees and charges still cannot exceed one percent of the loan amount.

According to the VA’s “Policy Clarification on Unallowable Fees,” dated May 7, 2014:

If the lender charges a $1,000 loan origination fee on a $100,000 loan, they have charged the maximum allowable origination fee, and cannot charge additional unallowable fees, such as a document preparation fee or pest inspection fee. However, if the lender charged an $800 loan origination fee on a $100,000 loan, the lender may charge up to $200 in unallowable fees, such as a document preparation fee or pest inspection fee. In all cases, the aggregate of the loan origination fee and unallowable fees cannot exceed the one percent threshold.

Since charging the flat one percent fee is so easy, why would any banker itemize unallowable fees and charges if they still cannot exceed the one percent threshold? Well, depending on the state the loan originates, some of those “unallowable” fees could be allowable, and would not count against the one percent threshold.

Today, the VA permits bankers to charge certain fees that would otherwise be included in the one percent cap on loans in 31 states. Take, for example, Texas. This state allows 11 exceptions—the most out of any state. Bankers that lend in Texas can recover costs from the participation fee on Texas Veterans Housing Assistance Program loans, housing quality standards fee on VHAP loans, attorney fees for refinances, title policy recoupment fees, title policy guaranty fees, escrow fees on refinances, tax certificates, tax deletion fees, elevation certificates, environmental protection lien endorsement, and pest inspection fees.

Arkansas has the second most exceptions with eight. New York comes in third with six exceptions. Other states with exceptions are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Virginia, Vermont and West Virginia.

As you would expect, many bankers have been reluctant to take advantage of state exceptions on VA loans because itemizing and then auditing the loan estimates and closing documents for compliance was a painstaking manual process—one that added time and cost and was fraught with the risk of miscalculating and exceeding the maximum amount allowed.

What is the role of compliance with these exceptions to the VA rule? We should be aware of these unique state changes and fee deviations published by the VA, particularly when reviewing loan closing documents. It is important to ensure that banks are not only compliant when charging fees to veterans and active-duty service members, but that they are also able to recover their allowable costs in each jurisdiction. Innovative technology solutions can assist with making sense of all the data, helping compliance professionals mitigate regulatory risk and improving efficiency and profitability in VA lending.

John I. Vong is executive chairman and co-founder of ComplianceEase, whose automated home mortgage compliance solutions are endorsed by ABA.

Tags: Mortgage
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA offers recommendations for improving community investment programs

FHA proposes changes to single-family housing minimum property requirements

Mortgage
September 23, 2026

The Federal Housing Administration proposed to “modernize and strengthen” its minimum property requirements for single-family housing by aligning them with other industry standards.

FCC proposes ‘robocall scorecard’ to rate voice service providers

ABA, associations urge FCC to adopt outcome-based robocall scorecard

Compliance and Risk
September 22, 2026

ABA joined other financial services associations to express strong support for the Federal Communications Commission’s proposed Robocall Mitigation Scorecard while recommending changes to ensure it provides consumers and businesses with meaningful information about voice service providers’ effectiveness in...

Fed releases agenda for upcoming conference on large bank capital requirements

Fed’s Jefferson provides update on discount window modernization

Compliance and Risk
September 22, 2026

In recent years, the Federal Reserve has taken steps to improve the discount window’s business operations, enhance its user experience, and boost collaboration with the Federal Home Loan Banks to increase how quickly banks can access liquidity, Fed...

FTC warns consumers about social media check fraud scam

ABA survey: Voters overwhelmingly support legislation to crack down on fraudulent social media ads

Compliance and Risk
September 22, 2026

Americans overwhelmingly support congressional efforts to crack down on fraudulent ads on social media platforms and hold online companies accountable for preventing scams, according to a new national survey of registered voters conducted by Fabrizio Ward on behalf...

Economic concerns causing U.S. adults to delay major financial decisions

Survey finds younger generations more likely to start building wealth at early age

Mortgage
September 21, 2026

Today’s young adults are beginning to build wealth years earlier than older generations did, but many of them still see homeownership as out of reach, according to a new survey by U.S. Bank.

BIS: Stablecoins fail as ‘sound money’

ABA, BPI seek regulatory consistency in proposed stablecoin reporting forms

Compliance and Risk
September 21, 2026

The FDIC should finalize reporting forms for stablecoin issuers only after it finalizes the regulatory requirements for those firms, and it should collaborate with other federal regulators to ensure all reporting forms are substantially similar, ABA and the...

NEWSBYTES

FHA proposes changes to single-family housing minimum property requirements

September 23, 2026

Bank economists: Business spending will drive resilient growth in the face of elevated inflation

September 23, 2026

ABA, associations urge FCC to adopt outcome-based robocall scorecard

September 22, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Beyond the Portfolio: The Wealth Manager’s New Role in a Multigenerational World

Beyond the Portfolio: The Wealth Manager’s New Role in a Multigenerational World

September 17, 2026
Banking Technology at a Strategic Crossroads

Banking Technology at a Strategic Crossroads

September 8, 2026
Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

September 1, 2026
Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

September 1, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Making the jump from a high performer to a high-performing leader

September 16, 2026

Podcast: Remembering 9/11, a quarter century later

September 10, 2026

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.