ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: September 2026

Can a loan officer wait more than 30 days to deny a completed application based on the possibility of improved financial information?

September 21, 2026
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Compliance question of the month: February 2025

My bank is requesting guidance regarding Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity Act) adverse action notifications.

The bank received a completed application and, based on the information submitted, determined that the applicant had insufficient income to qualify for the requested credit. However, the bank did not send the adverse action notice until 34 days after receiving the completed application. The loan officer delayed sending the notice because the officer hoped the applicant would submit additional information demonstrating an ability to repay the requested credit amount.

Q Does the possibility that the applicant might provide additional favorable information affect when the application is considered complete, or was the adverse action notice untimely based on Regulation B’s 30-day deadline?

A Assuming the bank had all the information it normally considers in making a credit decision, the application was complete, and the adverse action notice was untimely. Once an application is complete, the possibility that an applicant may provide additional information demonstrating an improved financial condition does not extend the 30-day notification period.

Regulation B requires a creditor to notify an applicant of its approval of, counteroffer to, or adverse action on a completed application within 30 days of receiving the application. 12 C.F.R. § 1002.9(a)(1)(i). Comment 9(a)(1)-1 explains that an application is considered complete once “a creditor has obtained all the information it normally considers in making a credit decision.”

Here, the loan officer reviewed the applicant’s information, determined that the applicant’s income and cash flow were insufficient to support the credit request, and ultimately denied the application for that reason. Thus, the bank was required to provide an adverse action notice within 30 days. The fact that the loan officer “hoped” the applicant could provide additional information demonstrating an improved financial condition would not, by itself, transform a completed application into an incomplete one or extend the 30-day notification period.

The analysis would differ if the bank needed additional information from the applicant that it normally considers in making its credit decision. In that case, the application would have been incomplete. Where an application is incomplete with respect to information the applicant can provide, § 1002.9(c) permits a creditor to, within 30 days, either take action on the application or provide a notice of incompleteness specifying the information needed and giving the applicant a reasonable period to provide it. Regardless of which approach the creditor takes, it must notify the applicant within 30 days.

One additional consideration is whether the request involved business credit rather than consumer credit. For business applicants with gross revenues of $1 million or less in the preceding fiscal year, the 30-day notification requirement generally applies. For business applicants with gross revenues exceeding $1 million, Regulation B permits notice of adverse action, either orally or in writing, within a reasonable time rather than within the strict 30-day timeframe. § 1002.9(a)(3).

For more information, contact ABA’s Leslie’s Callaway.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

Tags: ComplianceECOA
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Department of State: Sept. 21

Uncategorized
September 21, 2026

The Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Department of State announced the following sanctions action last week. Russia-related Sanctions OFAC issues Russia-Related General License: OFAC issued Russia-related General License 131J authorizing certain transactions related to the potential...

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Department of State: Sept. 14

Uncategorized
September 14, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

ABA files coalition amicus brief arguing FDIC’s CMP against CBW Bank violates Jarkesy

Seventh Circuit upholds FDIC’s in-house enforcement process

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Seventh Circuit panel ruled that the FDIC did not violate the Seventh Amendment by adjudicating an enforcement action seeking a prohibition order and civil money penalty.

Fifth Circuit rules SEC must fix stock buyback rule

Tenth Circuit affirms dismissal of APA challenge to SEC enforcement action

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

A unanimous Tenth Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the SEC’s enforcement of federal anti-money laundering reporting requirements against an affiliate.

FDIC posts sample docs to provide clarity into marketing, sale process of failing banks

Second Circuit rules AP7 has prudential standing to pursue Signature Bank securities claims

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

In a unanimous decision, a Second Circuit panel vacated a New York federal court decision ruling that Sjunde AP-Fonden (AP7) lacked prudential standing to pursue securities fraud claims against KPMG and former Signature Bank officers.

OCC releases Q3 bank trading revenue report

Nine states sue OCC over escrow powers and preemption rules

Uncategorized
September 1, 2026

Nine states sued the OCC, alleging it exceeded its authority and violated the APA by issuing its Escrow Powers and Preemption Rules.

NEWSBYTES

ABA urges FHA to revise RAP demonstration before launch

September 18, 2026

Kentucky community bankers make case for right-sizing regulation

September 18, 2026

ABA DataBank: Treasury yield spread narrows since start of year

September 18, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Beyond the Portfolio: The Wealth Manager’s New Role in a Multigenerational World

Beyond the Portfolio: The Wealth Manager’s New Role in a Multigenerational World

September 17, 2026
Banking Technology at a Strategic Crossroads

Banking Technology at a Strategic Crossroads

September 8, 2026
Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

Taming AI Agent Sprawl: A Playbook for Consumer Lending

September 1, 2026
Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

Grow Public Deposits Without the Operational Burden End Fragment

September 1, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Making the jump from a high performer to a high-performing leader

September 16, 2026

Podcast: Remembering 9/11, a quarter century later

September 10, 2026

Podcast: Banking the brave new world of college athletics

August 4, 2026

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.