ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: May 2025

May a bank provide consumers with a blanket exception hold notice as part of its Regulation CC account opening disclosures?

May 19, 2025
Reading Time: 1 min read
Compliance question of the month: February 2025

My bank has a question regarding the bank’s disclosure for large deposits under Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act).

QEffective July 1, 2025, the bank will begin placing statutory holds on all deposits. The bank would like to have its core automatically apply a hold on check deposits totaling more than $6,725 on any one day. The bank would like to disclose this in its account opening disclosures rather than providing a notice each time it places a hold. May the bank do this?

A No, except for non-consumer accounts.

The requirements for exception hold notices are spelled out in §229.13(g)(1), which states, in part, that “when a depositary bank extends the time when funds will be available for withdrawal based on the application of an exception contained in paragraphs (b) [the large dollar exception] through (f) of this section, it must provide the depositor with a written notice.”  Section 229.13(g)(1) provides that the notice must be provided to the depositor “at the time of the deposit,” with exceptions if the deposit is not made in person or a decision to place the hold is made after the deposit.

The bank cannot “disclose” that obligation away with a blanket disclosure.

However, a one-time notice provided about the large dollar exception (and redeposited checks) is an option for non-consumer accounts under §229.13(g)(2).  This notice may be provided at any time so long as it is provided before an exception is applied.

For more information, contact ABA’s Leslie Callaway.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

ADVERTISEMENT
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: June 16

Uncategorized
June 16, 2025

The Office of Foreign Assets Control announced the following sanctions action last week.

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: June 9

Uncategorized
June 9, 2025

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Preliminary injunction denied in bid to delay Capital One’s Discover purchase

Preliminary injunction denied in bid to delay Capital One’s Discover purchase

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

A California federal court denied a group of consumers’ motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to delay Capital One’s impending purchase of Discover.

Third Circuit reverses FCRA lawsuit against Nissan over lease dispute

Third Circuit reverses FCRA lawsuit against Nissan over lease dispute

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

A unanimous Third Circuit panel reversed a New Jersey federal court decision and ruled that a jury could find Nissan’s credit reporting inaccurate and its investigation unreasonable under the FCRA.

Green Dot agrees to pay Federal Reserve $44 Million to resolve UDAP allegations.

ABA, co-plaintiffs file joint motion with Federal Reserve to stay proceedings in stress test lawsuit

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

ABA and its co-plaintiffs filed a joint motion with the Fed to stay proceedings in their lawsuit claiming the Fed’s stress testing framework violates the APA.

U.S. Supreme Court vacates Ninth Circuit preemption decision

U.S. Supreme Court clarifies wire fraud liability

Uncategorized
June 2, 2025

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a defendant may be convicted of federal fraud for inducing a victim to enter into a transaction under materially false pretenses, even if the defendant did not intend to...

NEWSBYTES

Treasury official outlines principles for Bank Secrecy Act modernization

June 18, 2025

Report: Bank merger activity continues at steady pace

June 18, 2025

CFPB proposes ending using civil penalty funds for consumer education, financial literacy

June 18, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025
Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

Six Payments Trends Driving the Future of Transactions

March 15, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025

Podcast: What bankers need to know about ‘First Amendment audits’

June 5, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.