ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Compliance question of the month: How does a bank determine the Reg CC hold for repeated overdrafts?

June 21, 2024
Reading Time: 1 min read

There has been some confusion at my bank about holds based on repeated overdrafts. It is my understanding that this exception hold is based on the number of days overdrawn and not the number of items. For example, in a situation where a customer has only had two overdrafts, but the account remained negative for a total of 6 days in the last 6 months, the bank could utilize this exception hold.

Q Is this correct? May this apply to cashier’s check deposits?

A You are correct—the hold is based on days overdrawn, not the number of items. See §229.13(d) stating:

A depositary bank may consider a customer’s account to be repeatedly overdrawn if—

  1. On six or more banking days within the preceding six months, the account balance is negative, or the account balance would have become negative if checks or other charges to the account had been paid; or
  2. On two or more banking days within the preceding six months, the account balance is negative, (or the account balance would have become negative, in the amount of $5,000 or more, if checks or other charges to the account had been paid.) (emphasis added.)

And yes, the bank may apply a repeat overdraft exception hold to a cashier’s check. The customer’s status as a repeated over drafter trumps the check’s status as a next-day availability item.

For more information, contact ABA’s Leslie Callaway.
Please note that this section is not a substitute for professional legal advice.

Tags: Compliance
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: April 5

Recent news from Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: January 12

Uncategorized
January 12, 2026

News items that are the most recent sanctions-related actions from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Compliance question of the month: February 2025

Compliance question of the month: January 2026

Uncategorized
January 12, 2026

Compliance QOTM clarifies whether all loan renewals are reportable for CRA purposes.

Terrorism and money laundering aggregates published: April through June 2024

Terrorism and money laundering aggregates published: October through December 2025

Uncategorized
January 12, 2026

The FinCEN 314(a) Updates section is published on a periodic basis to better capture the trend line for 314(a) usage. The following is an update from October through December 2025.

ABA files amicus brief urging full Tenth Circuit to grant rehearing in Colorado rate opt-out lawsuit

ABA files amicus brief urging full Tenth Circuit to grant rehearing in Colorado rate opt-out lawsuit

Uncategorized
January 5, 2026

ABA filed a coalition amicus brief urging the Tenth Circuit to grant a rehearing en banc of a panel decision that reversed the District of Colorado’s preliminary injunction against Colorado’s rate opt-out law.

California federal court dismisses MiCamp Solutions’ antitrust lawsuit against Visa

California federal court dismisses MiCamp Solutions’ antitrust lawsuit against Visa

Uncategorized
January 5, 2026

Judge Haywood Gilliam of the Northern District of California dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Visa violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing the card payment services market.

U.S. Supreme Court rules CFPB’s funding structure is constitutional

Nonprofit organizations sue CFPB over alleged attempts to defund itself

Uncategorized
January 5, 2026

CFPB litigation Rise Economy v. Russell Vought Date: Dec. 8, 2025 Issue: Whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by refusing to request and accept statutorily authorized funding from the Board of Governors...

NEWSBYTES

Democratic senators introduce bill to lower credit card late fee cap

January 16, 2026

Gould suggests easing bank resolution planning requirements

January 16, 2026

Survey: Merchants expand payment options, express interest in crypto

January 16, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

Seeing More Check Fraud and Scams? These Educational Online Toolkits Can Help

November 1, 2025
5 FedNow®  Service Developments You May Have Missed

5 FedNow® Service Developments You May Have Missed

October 31, 2025

Cash, Security, and Resilience in a Digital-First Economy

October 20, 2025
Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

Rethinking Outsourcing: The Value of Tech-Enabled, Strategic Growth Partnerships

October 1, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: A Lone Star banking perspective

January 15, 2026

Podcast: The incredible shrinking penny (circulation)

January 8, 2026

Podcast: Cybersecurity in a mobile-first banking landscape

December 18, 2025

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.