ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Tax and Accounting

FASB Reviews CECL Implementation

December 3, 2020
Reading Time: 3 mins read

With the CECL accounting standard now in effect for large, public companies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board met on Dec. 2 to discuss the feedback it has received to date on the standard as part of its post-implementation review (PIR). As a reminder, FASB has touted the PIR as the mechanism through which it will address any issues that arise from CECL or other new major accounting standards. The process will be ongoing for two to three years after the standard’s effective date, so in the case of CECL, it should continue through 2024 or 2025. The process is fueled by outreach to various stakeholders and based on their feedback, the board may choose to undertake new projects.

What follows is a quick recap of the feedback discussed at the Dec. 2 meeting.

Non-PCD loans in an acquisition

FASB has received consistent feedback from investors that they were unable to compare how companies determined which loans are classified as “purchased with credit deterioration” (or PCD, which exempts the loans from the “day 1 loss” provision expense at acquisition) versus non-PCD based on disclosures that have been provided. In line with what ABA and the industry have communicated since the model was first proposed, FASB noted dislike from financial statement preparers for the non-PCD accounting model —specifically, that the “double-count” for non-PCD loans (reflecting both a fair value-based credit discount and a CECL allowance) is not consistent with the rest of the accounting standard, is inconsistent with the economics of the acquisition and may hurt bank valuations for M&A.

Overall, FASB members expressed a desire for the staff to develop a project to address this. ABA’s concern is that they will try to address the issue solely from the disclosure standpoint and not to actually fix the accounting, as this double-count normally increases goodwill, which is excluded from regulatory capital.

Disclosure

Investors also complained of a lack of comparability in disclosures and noted that they are unable to determine how banks are building their estimates based on the qualitative nature of the disclosures. Lack of comparability is fundamental to CECL and has been an issue in almost every comment letter the ABA has filed on the standard.

That being said, this is by far ABA’s biggest area of concern based on FASB’s discussion. Several board members are interested in creating significant quantitative disclosures to make CECL comparable for investors, though one would not support such a project until the SEC review process has had a chance to drive more consistent and comparable disclosure. Regardless, this is an area to keep close tabs on.

Troubled debt restructurings

FASB received feedback from ABA and others that the TDR model is obsolete, costly and provides little value to investors. FASB members discussed the potential for changing the accounting model on TDRs, including doing away with the TDR test and having a separate “disclosure-only” regime. No specifics emerged on how that would look, but board members either supported the position or expressed opposition not on substance, but based on it not being a priority issue as it relates to CECL.

Future Plans

FASB members mentioned potentially holding a roundtable event in spring—ABA will provide additional information to members when it becomes available. FASB Chairman Rich Jones also encouraged any companies, investors or others to reach out to them with any feedback.

ABA is in regular contact with FASB members and staff to provide feedback, but bankers are also strongly encouraged to give their own individual, direct feedback. Providing that feedback is easier than you think, so please reach out to me if you have interest in doing so.

Speaking of providing feedback and what’s next for CECL, ABA has refashioned its CECL efforts through a new CECL working group. The group’s purpose is to advise ABA staff on advocacy direction and efforts regarding CECL. The current focus is on regulatory capital relief, legislative technical correction and extension of CARES Act Section 4014, and seeking operational relief for smaller institutions via a “CECL-lite” option.

If you have any questions, are interested the CECL Working Group, or want to know more about “CECL lite,” contact me for more information.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: CECLFASB
ShareTweetPin

Author

Josh Stein

Josh Stein

Josh Stein is VP for accounting policy at ABA.

Related Posts

ABA, associations urge lawmakers to finalize deal on debt ceiling

Updated: President signs ‘big beautiful bill’ including numerous ABA-backed provisions

Ag Banking
July 3, 2025

Included in the bill were several ABA-supported tax provisions related to banks, including a modified version of the ABA-advocated ACRE Act and the permanent extension of the Section 199A pass-through deduction rate of 20%.

ABA offers feedback to FASB request for input on its agenda development 

ABA offers feedback to FASB request for input on its agenda development 

Newsbytes
July 1, 2025

The association’s feedback identifies opportunities to more closely align underlying economics with accounting outcomes; opportunities to balance costs relative to benefits; and topic areas for which ABA does not believe a project should be added.

House-Passed Defense Bill Includes SAFE Banking Act

ABA, state associations support tax provisions in budget bill

Newsbytes
June 29, 2025

Provisions welcomed by ABA and the state associations include a narrow version of the ACRE Act and a permanent Section 199A deduction that levels the playing field for Subchapter S banks.

First-party data: Smarter insights when determining creditworthiness

Volatility prompts banks to hoard cash and implement financial hedges

Compliance and Risk
June 24, 2025

Even smaller banks with only a few billion dollars in assets are using swaps and other derivatives to more proactively hedge risk.

ABA comments on proposal to improve accounting in tax credit structures

Senate tax measure contains provisions on ACRE, pass-through business deduction

Ag Banking
June 17, 2025

The Senate Finance Committee released its reconciliation tax text that contains several differences from the version passed by the House, including changes to provisions related to the ACRE Act and the Section 199A passthrough business deduction.

A Risk Manager’s Guide to the Reference Rate Transition

Credit-sensitive Libor replacements still seek traction

Commercial Lending
June 16, 2025

Looming volatility and recent developments may give AXI and Ameribor a boost

NEWSBYTES

Consumer credit increased 1.2% in May

July 8, 2025

Justice Department warns of scammers exploiting Texas floods

July 8, 2025

Business First to buy Progressive Bancorp in Louisiana

July 8, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025

Podcast: Old National’s Jim Ryan on the things that really matter

June 12, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.