ABA Banking Journal
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
SUBSCRIBE
ABA Banking Journal
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Legal

A Surge of Support for ‘Valid When Made’

December 2, 2019
Reading Time: 3 mins read

By Dawn Causey, Thomas Pinder and Andrew Doersam

Thanks to the Second Circuit’s 2015 decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, lenders are operating in an unpredictable marketplace, facing uncertainty whether the Madden court’s questionable analysis will infect other circuits. According to Madden, when nonbanks purchase loans from banks on the secondary market, the usury laws of other states can apply. To stop Madden from flooding into other circuits, the OCC and FDIC filed a compelling friend-of-the-court brief urging a Colorado federal district court to ignore Madden and uphold the sanctity of the “valid when made” doctrine. What is more, OCC and FDIC each proposed rules to codify the “valid when made” doctrine.

For nearly two centuries, the valid when made doctrine has served as the bedrock for bank lending. Under this doctrine, a loan that is valid from the start cannot become usurious after the loan is sold or transferred to another person. Incredibly, the Second Circuit did not acknowledge the doctrine in Madden. The Second Circuit reasoned that applying New York usury law to Midland, a purchaser of charged-off credit debt, did not “significantly interfere” with a national bank’s ability to exercise its powers under the National Bank Act.

The OCC swiftly criticized Madden. In an amicus filing, the U.S. solicitor general and the OCC called Madden “incorrect.” They implored the Supreme Court to deny Midland’s petition, because the case was a poor vehicle for the court to address the merits given the Second Circuit’s failure to consider the valid when made doctrine. After Supreme Court refused to review Madden, overzealous plaintiffs’ attorneys had an opportunity to cite Madden as precedent for litigation in other circuits.

And this prescience was validated in Colorado. During a bankruptcy proceeding, Rent-Rite tried to halt a $660,000 proof of claim submitted by World Business Lenders. WBL acquired a business loan from Bank of Lake Mills, a state-chartered bank, that carried an interest rate of 120.86 percent. Rent-Rite sought to disallow the claim because the interest rate exceeded Colorado’s 45 percent state-law maximum. However, the bankruptcy court ruled that under Section 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, Bank of Lake Mills could charge the 120.86 percent interest rate because the rate was permissible under Wisconsin law. “The valid when made rule remains the law,” the court wrote. “Any contrary legal standard would interfere with the proper functioning of state banks and risks a myriad of problems.”

The OCC and FDIC lauded the bankruptcy court in their joint brief for brushing aside Madden. Describing Madden as “unfathomable,” the agencies strongly asserted that under the valid when made doctrine, an interest rate that is non-usurious when the loan is made remains non-usurious after the assignment of the loan. According to the agencies, the Second Circuit “blink[ed] reality” by ignoring the fact that “if the interest rate is not enforceable upon assignment, there is nothing for the bank to assign.” In other words, banks must be able to sell their loans, and the state law at issue in Madden was preempted because banks would be precluded from transferring their rates to assignees. What is more, if banks cannot transfer their usury-exempted rates, and assignees cannot enforce them, the agencies emphasized that loan sales to the secondary market would be “disastrous” for banks, which need the ability to sell loans to properly maintain their capital, liquidity and ultimately their safety and soundness.

The long-running saga of Madden entered a new phase when OCC and FDIC issued proposed rules that codify the “valid when made” doctrine. To end the Madden uncertainty, OCC proposed to amend 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001 (for national banks) and 12 C.F.R. § 160.110 (for federal savings associations) by providing that interest on a loan will not be affected by the sale, assignment, or other transfer of the loan. Additionally, FDIC proposed a new regulation (12 C.F.R. § 331) to clarify that an interest rate is determined at the time that the loan is made, and that the interest rate is not affected by later events. However, neither proposal addresses the “true lender” doctrine. Under the true lender doctrine, the entity that makes a loan and then assigns it to a third party is the true lender.

It remains to be seen if the Madden mess will finally be fixed. The proposed rules are an important development given that plaintiffs have relied on Madden to challenge marketplace lending arrangements or other traditional secondary market loan sales. Hopefully the agencies’ brief and proposed rules will serve as a levee to stop the Madden flood waters from expanding.

Dawn Causey is general counsel at ABA, where Thomas Pinder is depty general counsel and Andrew Doersam is a paralegal.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: FintechValid-when-made
ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

ABA, associations urge Congress to overturn CFPB credit card late fees rule

ABA urges lawmakers to take up Dodd-Frank reform

Newsbytes
July 15, 2025

ABA shared several possible reforms for the Dodd-Frank Act as the law approaches the 15th anniversary of its enactment, saying changes are needed to mitigate its burdens on banks of all sizes.

Senate Banking Committee advances OCC, SEC nominations

Gould takes office as comptroller of the currency

Compliance and Risk
July 15, 2025

Jonathan Gould was sworn in as the 32nd comptroller of the currency. He succeeds Rodney Hood, who was acting comptroller for five months.

FDIC withdraws proposed rules on brokered deposits, corporate governance, executive pay

FDIC board advances proposals on industrial banks, supervisory appeals, bank branches

Community Banking
July 15, 2025

The FDIC board voted to roll back Biden-era actions on industrial banks, supervisory appeals and CRA implementation. It also introduced a proposal to streamline the agency’s approval process for new bank branches.

FDIC proposes tying agency regulatory thresholds to inflation

FDIC proposes tying agency regulatory thresholds to inflation

Compliance and Risk
July 15, 2025

The FDIC board voted to advance a proposal to regularly adjust some of the agency’s regulatory thresholds for banks to keep pace with inflation.

Basel tweaks proposed cryptoasset treatment, adopts certain ABA recommendations

How stablecoins could affect borrowing costs for the government, businesses and households

Economy
July 14, 2025

Policymakers must weigh short-term fiscal gains against the long-term health of the real economy.

CFPB warns against collection of ‘legally invalid’ medical debt

Court vacates CFPB medical debt rule

Compliance and Risk
July 14, 2025

A federal court in Texas vacated the CFPB’s medical debt reporting rule after the bureau’s current leadership joined with plaintiffs in asking it to be struck down.

NEWSBYTES

ABA urges lawmakers to take up Dodd-Frank reform

July 15, 2025

Budget reconciliation includes rural and agricultural benefits

July 15, 2025

Gould takes office as comptroller of the currency

July 15, 2025

SPONSORED CONTENT

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Navigating Disruption in Ag Lending – Why Tariffs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

July 1, 2025
AI Compliance and Regulation: What Financial Institutions Need to Know

Unlocking Deposit Growth: How Financial Institutions Can Activate Data for Precision Cross-Sell

June 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

Choosing the Right Account Opening Platform: 10 Key Considerations for Long-Term Success

April 25, 2025
Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

Outsourcing: Getting to Go/No-Go

April 5, 2025

PODCASTS

Breaking down the bank-related provisions in the big budget bill

July 10, 2025

Podcast: Inside ABA’s new Treasury Check Verification System API

June 25, 2025

Podcast: Staying close to clients amid tariff-driven volatility

June 18, 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Ag Banking
    • Commercial Lending
    • Community Banking
    • Compliance and Risk
    • Cybersecurity
    • Economy
    • Human Resources
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Mortgage
    • Mutual Funds
    • Payments
    • Policy
    • Retail and Marketing
    • Tax and Accounting
    • Technology
    • Wealth Management
  • Newsbytes
  • Podcasts
  • Magazine
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Podcast Archive
    • Sponsored Content Archive

© 2025 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.