Browsing: Compliance and Risk

Compliance and Risk

The FDIC yesterday issued revised interagency examination procedures for the TILA-RESPA integrated disclosures now proposed to take effect on Oct. 3. The procedures also include updates related to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s ability-to-repay, servicing and high-priced mortgage loan rules.

Community Banking

Rep. Scott Tipton today introduced the TAILOR Act (H.R. 2896), which would require financial regulators to consider bank risk profiles and business models when taking regulatory actions. The bill — a part of ABA’s Agenda for America’s Hometown Banks — has been strongly advocated by ABA and the alliance of state bankers associations.

Compliance and Risk

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that disparate impact claims are enforceable under the Fair Housing Act. The decision in the case — Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project — included a note of caution that statistical disparities only impose liability if plaintiffs can connect it to a defendant’s policy causing the disparity in order to “protect defendants against abusive disparate-impact claims.”

Compliance and Risk

Case: Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs, et al. v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., et al. Issue: Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). Case Summary: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that disparate impact claims may be alleged under the FHA. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. (ICP) brought a disparate

1 174 175 176 177 178 185